These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20329864)

  • 1. Two-microphone separation of speech mixtures based on interclass variance maximization.
    Cobos M; Lopez JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1661-72. PubMed ID: 20329864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources.
    Lavandier M; Jelfs S; Culling JF; Watkins AJ; Raimond AP; Makin SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):218-31. PubMed ID: 22280586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Segregation of unvoiced speech from nonspeech interference.
    Hu G; Wang D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1306-19. PubMed ID: 18681616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A frequency bin-wise nonlinear masking algorithm in convolutive mixtures for speech segregation.
    Chi TS; Huang CW; Chou WS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):EL361-7. PubMed ID: 22559453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech segregation in rooms: effects of reverberation on both target and interferer.
    Lavandier M; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1713. PubMed ID: 17927431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimation of sparse nonnegative sources from noisy overcomplete mixtures using MAP.
    Caiafa CF; Cichocki A
    Neural Comput; 2009 Dec; 21(12):3487-518. PubMed ID: 19764872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A biologically motivated neural network for phase extraction from complex sounds.
    Borst M; Langner G; Palm G
    Biol Cybern; 2004 Feb; 90(2):98-104. PubMed ID: 14999476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Front-back confusion resolution in three-dimensional sound localization using databases built with a dummy head.
    Ovcharenko A; Cho SJ; Chong UP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):489-95. PubMed ID: 17614506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):496-511. PubMed ID: 17614507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The dynamic range of speech, compression, and its effect on the speech reception threshold in stationary and interrupted noise.
    Rhebergen KS; Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3236-45. PubMed ID: 20000937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preceding weak noise sharpens the frequency tuning and elevates the response threshold of the mouse inferior collicular neurons through GABAergic inhibition.
    Wang X; Jen PH; Wu FJ; Chen QC
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1167():80-91. PubMed ID: 17689505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monaural sound-source-direction estimation using the acoustic transfer function of a parabolic reflection board.
    Takashima R; Takiguchi T; Ariki Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):902-8. PubMed ID: 20136213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids.
    Luts H; Eneman K; Wouters J; Schulte M; Vormann M; Buechler M; Dillier N; Houben R; Dreschler WA; Froehlich M; Puder H; Grimm G; Hohmann V; Leijon A; Lombard A; Mauler D; Spriet A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1491-505. PubMed ID: 20329849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of a sigmoidal-shaped function for noise attenuation in cochlear implants.
    Hu Y; Loizou PC; Li N; Kasturi K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):EL128-34. PubMed ID: 17902741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.