193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20331333)
1. Comparison of acceptance, preference, and efficacy between jet injection INJEX and local infiltration anesthesia in 6 to 11 year old dental patients.
Arapostathis KN; Dabarakis NN; Coolidge T; Tsirlis A; Kotsanos N
Anesth Prog; 2010; 57(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 20331333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is the jet injection effective for teeth extraction?
Ocak H; Akkoyun EF; Çolpak HA; Demetoğlu U; Yücesoy T; Kılıç E; Alkan A
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Feb; 121(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 31077857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of acceptance, preference and efficacy between pressure anesthesia and classical needle infiltration anesthesia for dental restorative procedures in adult patients.
Makade CS; Shenoi PR; Gunwal MK
J Conserv Dent; 2014 Mar; 17(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 24778516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Needle-less local anesthesia: clinical evaluation of the effectiveness of the jet anesthesia Injex in local anesthesia in dentistry.
Dabarakis NN; Alexander V; Tsirlis AT; Parissis NA; Nikolaos M
Quintessence Int; 2007; 38(10):E572-6. PubMed ID: 18197315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative assessment of efficacy and preference between needleless device INJEX and insulin syringe for anesthetizing primary maxillary teeth in children aged 4-9 years: A split-mouth crossover randomized clinical study.
Patel M; Bhatt R; Mehta M; Patel C; Patel F; Makwani D
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2023; 41(2):149-155. PubMed ID: 37635474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical evaluation of the INJEX system, a local anesthesia system without needles: a comfort evaluation study].
Geenen L; Marks LA; Martens LC
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2004; 59(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 15526641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The needleless syringe: efficacy of anesthesia and patient preference in child dental patients.
Saravia ME; Bush JP
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1991; 15(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 1931745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of anesthesia and patient preference using the needle-less jet syringe in pediatric dental practice.
Munshi AK; Hegde A; Bashir N
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 11314212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of the systems used for providing local anesthesia in dentistry--the Wand (Milestone Scientific) and Injex (Rosch)].
Zarzecka J; Gończowski K; Kesek B; Darczuk D; Zapała J
Przegl Lek; 2006; 63(12):1304-9. PubMed ID: 17642145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of anesthetic properties and pain during needleless jet injection anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial.
Oliveira ACA; Amorim KS; Nascimento Júnior EMD; Duarte ACB; Groppo FC; Takeshita WM; Souza LMA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2019 Jan; 27():e20180195. PubMed ID: 30673030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computerized anesthesia delivery system vs. traditional syringe: comparing pain and pain-related behavior in children.
Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 16324138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pain behaviour and distress in children during two sequential dental visits: comparing a computerised anaesthesia delivery system and a traditional syringe.
Versloot J; Veerkamp JS; Hoogstraten J
Br Dent J; 2008 Jul; 205(1):E2; discussion 30-1. PubMed ID: 18493254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Evaluation of New Needleless Local Anesthetic System (INJEX) and Conventional Syringe Needle Technique during Pulpotomy Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Vishwanathaiah S; Albar NH; Alraghi FTA; Jaferi NEM; Tumayhi IAM; Panda S; Khormi FAH; Jaafari AHH; Abiri ZAI; Maganur PC
Children (Basel); 2024 Apr; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 38790509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison in Patient Comfort Using Conventional Syringe and Needleless Jet Anesthesia Technique in Periodontal Surgery-A Split-Mouth Randomized Clinical Trial.
Shankar P; Chellathurai BNK; Kumar SA; Mahendra J; Mugri MH; Sayed M; Almagbol M; Al Wadei MHD; Vijayalakshmi R; Ambalavanan N; Raj AT; Patil S
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Feb; 58(2):. PubMed ID: 35208601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [A needle-free intraoral injection technic. Clinical study of patient acceptance of the Syrijet Mark II Needleless Injector (Mizzi, Inc., N.J., U.S.A.)].
Grau T; Ernst CP; Willershausen B
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1997; 107(11):993-1002. PubMed ID: 9463224
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The feasibility of needleless jet injection versus conventional needle local anesthesia during dental procedures: a systematic review.
Alameeri AA; AlShamsi HA; Murad A; Alhammadi MM; Alketbi MH; AlHamwi A; Rawi NHA; Kawas SA; Mohammed MM; Shetty SR
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 48(6):331-341. PubMed ID: 36579904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reaction of 5 and 6 year olds to dental injection after viewing the needle: pilot study.
Maragakis GM; Musselman RJ; Ho CC
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 17091654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A clinician guide to patients afraid of dental injections and numbness.
Armfield JM; Milgrom P
SAAD Dig; 2011 Jan; 27():33-9. PubMed ID: 21323034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adjuncts to local anesthesia: separating fact from fiction.
Wong JK
J Can Dent Assoc; 2001; 67(7):391-7. PubMed ID: 11468097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe.
Ram D; Peretz B
J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 14528773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
