BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20332170)

  • 1. Radiation hormesis--a remedy for fear.
    Jaworowski Z
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 20332170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biological effects of low level exposures to ionizing radiation: theory and practice.
    Liu SZ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 20332172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Basis of radiation protection].
    Roth J; Schweizer P; Gückel C
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1996 Jun; 126(26):1157-71. PubMed ID: 8711464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Public health. Genomics and medicine at a crossroads in Chernobyl.
    Ginsburg GS; Angrist M; Cook-Deegan R
    Science; 2006 Oct; 314(5796):62-3. PubMed ID: 17023637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: detriment versus hormesis. Part 1. Dose responses of cells and tissues.
    Feinendegen LE; Pollycove M
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 42(7):17N-27N. PubMed ID: 11441881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    Valentin J;
    Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The meaning of low dose and low dose-rate.
    Wakeford R; Tawn EJ
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20234068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: Detriment versus hormesis. Part 2. Dose responses of organisms.
    Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):26N-32N, 37N. PubMed ID: 11554390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Health risks for the Hungarian population due to the nuclear accident in Chernobyl].
    Köteles G
    Orv Hetil; 2002 Jun; 143(23):1411-4. PubMed ID: 12132327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cytogenetic control in exposure to ionizing radiation sources (review of literature)].
    Nugis VIu
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2006; (10):30-6. PubMed ID: 17136843
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear No-Threshold model and standards for protection against radiation.
    Shamoun DY
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Jun; 77():49-53. PubMed ID: 26924276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Exposure of healthcare personnel to ionizing radiation in the light of radiation hormesis hypothesis].
    Kraska A; Bilski B
    Med Pr; 2012; 63(3):371-6. PubMed ID: 22880457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation cataractogenesis: a review of recent studies.
    Ainsbury EA; Bouffler SD; Dörr W; Graw J; Muirhead CR; Edwards AA; Cooper J
    Radiat Res; 2009 Jul; 172(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19580502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Current epidemiological evidence regarding the health effects of low-dose ionizing radiation. Implications for radiation protection, public health and forensic medicine].
    Manzoli L; Romano F; Schioppa F; D'Ovidio C; Lodi V; Pirone GM
    Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2004; 60(1-2):81-102. PubMed ID: 15213763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept.
    Calabrese EJ
    Arch Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 87(9):1621-33. PubMed ID: 23887208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standards for protection against radiation--Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Final rule.
    Fed Regist; 1991 May; 56(98):23360-474. PubMed ID: 10111345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Do new studies justify a re-evaluation of the risks of low-dose radiation?].
    Axelson O
    Lakartidningen; 1990 Aug; 87(32-33):2481-5. PubMed ID: 2398762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: adaptive response versus bystander effect.
    Adelstein SJ
    J Nucl Med; 2003 Jan; 44(1):125; author reply 125-6. PubMed ID: 12515886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Nuclear energy and public health, the mission of OPRI (Office of Protection from Ionizing Radiation)].
    Tisné MR
    Rev Prat; 1995 Mar; 45(6 Spec No):53-6. PubMed ID: 7754326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regulatory implications of a linear non-threshold (LNT) dose-based risks.
    Aleta CR
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1290-8. PubMed ID: 19299154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.