BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

483 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20332172)

  • 1. Biological effects of low level exposures to ionizing radiation: theory and practice.
    Liu SZ
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 20332172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation hormesis--a remedy for fear.
    Jaworowski Z
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 20332170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Carcinogenic effects of low-level ionizing radiation: problems and prospects.
    Upton AC
    In Vivo; 2002; 16(6):527-33. PubMed ID: 12494897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
    Scott BR
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ionizing radiation and cancer risk: evidence from epidemiology.
    Ron E
    Radiat Res; 1998 Nov; 150(5 Suppl):S30-41. PubMed ID: 9806607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Prevention of cancer and the dose-effect relationship: the carcinogenic effects of ionizing radiations].
    Tubiana M
    Cancer Radiother; 2009 Jul; 13(4):238-58. PubMed ID: 19539515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: Detriment versus hormesis. Part 2. Dose responses of organisms.
    Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):26N-32N, 37N. PubMed ID: 11554390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Toward improved ionizing radiation safety standards.
    Raabe OG
    Health Phys; 2011 Jul; 101(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 21617395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiation and your patient: a guide for medical practitioners.
    Ann ICRP; 2001; 31(4):5-31. PubMed ID: 12685757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utilization of developmental basic science principles in the evaluation of reproductive risks from pre- and postconception environmental radiation exposures.
    Brent RL
    Teratology; 1999 Apr; 59(4):182-204. PubMed ID: 10331519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: detriment versus hormesis. Part 1. Dose responses of cells and tissues.
    Feinendegen LE; Pollycove M
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 42(7):17N-27N. PubMed ID: 11441881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Side effects of ionizing radiation on healthy tissues and organs at risk].
    Cosset JM
    Cancer Radiother; 2010 Jul; 14(4-5):228-31. PubMed ID: 20598612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses.
    Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
    J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hormesis. A healthful dab of radiation?
    Kaiser J
    Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5644):378. PubMed ID: 14563982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Health outcomes of low-dose ionizing radiation exposure among medical workers: a cohort study of the Canadian national dose registry of radiation workers.
    Zielinski JM; Garner MJ; Band PR; Krewski D; Shilnikova NS; Jiang H; Ashmore PJ; Sont WN; Fair ME; Letourneau EG; Semenciw R
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2009; 22(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 19546093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Epidemiological data and radiation risk estimates].
    Cardis E
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2002 Jan; 50(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 11938114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prevention and management of radiation myelopathy.
    Ang KK; Stephens LC
    Oncology (Williston Park); 1994 Nov; 8(11):71-6; discussion 78, 81-2. PubMed ID: 7826840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bystander effects, genomic instability, adaptive response, and cancer risk assessment for radiation and chemical exposures.
    Preston RJ
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Sep; 207(2 Suppl):550-6. PubMed ID: 15979669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deceleration of carcinogenic potential by adaptation with low dose gamma irradiation.
    Bhattacharjee D; Ito A
    In Vivo; 2001; 15(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 11286136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of censoring on cancer risk estimates based on the Canadian National Dose Registry of occupational radiation exposure.
    Shin H; Ramsay T; Krewski D; Zielinski JM
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 15(5):398-406. PubMed ID: 15592443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.