These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20332471)

  • 21. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
    Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Risk of residual invasive disease in women with microinvasive squamous cancer in a conization specimen.
    Roman LD; Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Agahjanian A; Qian D; Morrow CP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):759-64. PubMed ID: 9351760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
    Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Human papillomavirus test after conization in predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy specimens.
    Park JY; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YM; Kim YT; Nam JH
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jul; 114(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 19546763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
    Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predictors of residual carcinoma or carcinoma-in-situ at hysterectomy following cervical conization with positive margins.
    Diaz ES; Aoyama C; Baquing MA; Beavis A; Silva E; Holschneider C; Cass I
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24262876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term outcome after cold-knife conization with clear margins.
    Reich O; Pickel H; Lahousen M; Tamussino K; Winter R
    Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Mar; 97(3):428-30. PubMed ID: 11239650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II-III with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop conization: is there any predictor for residual disease?
    Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Srisomboon J; Siriaunkgul S; Suprasert P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Oct; 33(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 17845326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Microinvasive squamous carcinoma of the cervix: treatment modalities.
    Mota F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Jun; 82(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 12780420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The value of frozen sectioning for the evaluation of resection margins in cases of conization.
    Behtash N; Karimi Zarchi M; Hamedi B; Azmoode Ardalan F; Tehranian A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Nov; 276(5):529-32. PubMed ID: 17628817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prediction of residual neoplasia based on histopathology and margin status of conization specimens.
    Chang DY; Cheng WF; Torng PL; Chen RJ; Huang SC
    Gynecol Oncol; 1996 Oct; 63(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8898168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis of treatment modalities and prognosis on microinvasive cervical cancer: a 10-year cohort study in China.
    Qian Q; Yang J; Cao D; You Y; Chen J; Shen K
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):293-300. PubMed ID: 25142622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Risk factors predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) III and microinvasive cervical cancer.
    Park JY; Lee SM; Yoo CW; Kang S; Park SY; Seo SS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 17582476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is conization once following by simple hysterectomy sufficient for all clinical stage IA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma?
    Chen JR; Chiu ML; Wang TY; Chen TC; Wang KG; Su TH; Chang CL; Yang YC; Wang KL
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 52(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 24075378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Resection margins in conization as prognostic marker for relapse in high-grade dysplasia of the uterine cervix in northern Norway: a retrospective long-term follow-up material.
    Ørbo A; Arnesen T; Arnes M; Straume B
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 May; 93(2):479-83. PubMed ID: 15099966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Oncologic and obstetric outcomes after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ or stage IA1 cervical cancer.
    Wang X; Bi Y; Wu H; Wu M; Li L
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19920. PubMed ID: 33199765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: long-term follow-up after cold-knife conization with involved margins.
    Reich O; Lahousen M; Pickel H; Tamussino K; Winter R
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 11814495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical value of cold knife conization as conservative management in patients with microinvasive cervical squamous cell cancer (stage IA1).
    He Y; Wu YM; Zhao Q; Wang T; Wang Y; Kong WM; Song F; Duan W; Zhu L; Zhang WY
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Sep; 24(7):1306-11. PubMed ID: 24987910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. CO2 laser cylindrical excision or standard re-conization for persistent-recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-CIN) in women of fertile age.
    Fambrini M; Penna C; Pieralli A; Fallani MG; Andersson KL; Lozza V; Scarselli G; Marchionni M
    Anticancer Res; 2008; 28(6B):3871-5. PubMed ID: 19192643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The role of endocervical curettage at cervical conization for high-grade dysplasia.
    Kobak WH; Roman LD; Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Schlaerth JB; Morrow CP
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Feb; 85(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 7824230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.