237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20332809)
1. Multi-locus inference of population structure: a comparison between single nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellites.
Haasl RJ; Payseur BA
Heredity (Edinb); 2011 Jan; 106(1):158-71. PubMed ID: 20332809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A genomewide comparison of population structure at STRPs and nearby SNPs in humans.
Payseur BA; Jing P
Mol Biol Evol; 2009 Jun; 26(6):1369-77. PubMed ID: 19289600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linkage disequilibrium between STRPs and SNPs across the human genome.
Payseur BA; Place M; Weber JL
Am J Hum Genet; 2008 May; 82(5):1039-50. PubMed ID: 18423524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and microsatellites in inference of population structure.
Liu N; Chen L; Wang S; Oh C; Zhao H
BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S26. PubMed ID: 16451635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A coalescent simulation of marker selection strategy for candidate gene association studies.
Cole SM; Long JC
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet; 2008 Jan; 147B(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 17722024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linking short tandem repeat polymorphisms with cytosine modifications in human lymphoblastoid cell lines.
Zhang Z; Zheng Y; Zhang X; Liu C; Joyce BT; Kibbe WA; Hou L; Zhang W
Hum Genet; 2016 Feb; 135(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 26714498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An empirical comparison of population genetic analyses using microsatellite and SNP data for a species of conservation concern.
Zimmerman SJ; Aldridge CL; Oyler-McCance SJ
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jun; 21(1):382. PubMed ID: 32487020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The efficacy of short tandem repeat polymorphisms versus single-nucleotide polymorphisms for resolving population structure.
Kauwe JS; Bertelsen S; Bierut LJ; Dunn G; Hinrichs AL; Jin CH; Suarez BK
BMC Genet; 2005 Dec; 6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S84. PubMed ID: 16451699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Investigation into the ability of SNP chipsets and microsatellites to detect association with a disease locus.
Curtis D; Vine AE; Knight J
Ann Hum Genet; 2008 Jul; 72(Pt 4):547-56. PubMed ID: 18355389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterizing genic and nongenic molecular markers: comparison of microsatellites and SNPs.
DeFaveri J; Viitaniemi H; Leder E; Merilä J
Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 May; 13(3):377-92. PubMed ID: 23356957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precision and accuracy of divergence time estimates from STR and SNPSTR variation.
Ramakrishnan U; Mountain JL
Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Oct; 21(10):1960-71. PubMed ID: 15254260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for assessing the genetic structure of chicken populations.
Gärke C; Ytournel F; Bed'hom B; Gut I; Lathrop M; Weigend S; Simianer H
Anim Genet; 2012 Aug; 43(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 22497629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative informativeness for linkage of multiple SNPs and single microsatellites.
Lindholm E; Hodge SE; Greenberg DA
Hum Hered; 2004; 58(3-4):164-70. PubMed ID: 15812173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiating salmon populations at broad and fine geographical scales with microsatellites and single nucleotide polymorphisms.
Narum SR; Banks M; Beacham TD; Bellinger MR; Campbell MR; Dekoning J; Elz A; Guthrie CM; Kozfkay C; Miller KM; Moran P; Phillips R; Seeb LW; Smith CT; Warheit K; Young SF; Garza JC
Mol Ecol; 2008 Aug; 17(15):3464-77. PubMed ID: 19160476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An empirical comparison of SNPs and microsatellites for parentage and kinship assignment in a wild sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) population.
Hauser L; Baird M; Hilborn R; Seeb LW; Seeb JE
Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Mar; 11 Suppl 1():150-61. PubMed ID: 21429171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reliability of haplotyping inference in nuclear families: misassignment rates for SNPs and microsatellites.
Lindholm E; Zhang J; Hodge SE; Greenberg DA
Hum Hered; 2004; 57(3):117-27. PubMed ID: 15297805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. STRP screening sets for the human genome at 5 cM density.
Ghebranious N; Vaske D; Yu A; Zhao C; Marth G; Weber JL
BMC Genomics; 2003 Feb; 4(1):6. PubMed ID: 12600278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Linked vs unlinked markers: multilocus microsatellite haplotype-sharing as a tool to estimate gene flow and introgression.
Koopman WJ; Li Y; Coart E; van de Weg WE; Vosman B; Roldán-Ruiz I; Smulders MJ
Mol Ecol; 2007 Jan; 16(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17217342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genotyping polymorphic microhaplotype markers through the Illumina
Zhu J; Lv M; Zhou N; Chen D; Jiang Y; Wang L; He W; Peng D; Li Z; Qu S; Wang Y; Wang H; Luo H; An G; Liang W; Zhang L
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Mar; 39():1-7. PubMed ID: 30472641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Further tests of the association between schizophrenia and single nucleotide polymorphism markers at the catechol-O-methyltransferase locus in an Askenazi Jewish population using microsatellite markers.
Horowitz A; Shifman S; Rivlin N; Pisanté A; Darvasi A
Psychiatr Genet; 2005 Sep; 15(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 16094249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
