These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

45 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20333042)

  • 1. Radiographic screen-film noise power spectrum: variation with microdensitometer slit length.
    Sandrik JM; Wagner RF
    Appl Opt; 1981 Aug; 20(16):2795-8. PubMed ID: 20333042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wiener spectrum of radiographic systems: comparison of different evaluation methods.
    Bregant P; De Denaro M; De Guarrini F; Borasi G
    Radiol Med; 1997 May; 93(5):613-7. PubMed ID: 9251741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noise power spectrum analysis of a scanning microdensitometer.
    Bunch PC; Van Metter R
    Appl Opt; 1988 Aug; 27(16):3468-74. PubMed ID: 20539401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new method for microdensitometer slit length correction of radiographic noise power spectra.
    Koedooder K; Strackee J; Venema HW
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(4):469-73. PubMed ID: 3736504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
    Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiographic screen-film noise power spectrum: calibration and intercomparison.
    Sandrik JM; Wagner RF; Hanson KM
    Appl Opt; 1982 Oct; 21(19):3597-601. PubMed ID: 20396279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of microdensitometer scan slit misalignment in MTF determinations.
    Villafana T
    Med Phys; 1975; 2(5):255-8. PubMed ID: 1186631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The evaluation of the performance of a new-concept screen-film system].
    Tosi G; Brambilla MG; De Crescenzo S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 1475429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-frequency Wiener spectra of radiographic screen-film systems.
    Wolf M; Angerstein W
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 May; 32(5):557-64. PubMed ID: 3588669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Wiener spectra of roentgen film-screen combinations].
    Mirandé W; Hoeschen D
    Rontgenblatter; 1985 Mar; 38(3):81-4. PubMed ID: 3992138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relation between one- and two-dimensional noise power spectra of magnetic resonance images.
    Ichinoseki Y; Machida Y
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Jun; 10(2):161-170. PubMed ID: 27699636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Film quality in film mammography. Article II: Signal/noise ratio of the recording system as a quantitative measure of quality. Final evaluation of recording systems (author's transl)].
    Friedrich M; Weskamp P
    Rofo; 1976 Nov; 125(5):461-71. PubMed ID: 137194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design considerations in power spectra measurements by diffraction of coherent light.
    Stark H; Bennett WR; Arm M
    Appl Opt; 1969 Nov; 8(11):2165-72. PubMed ID: 20075994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation transfer function of a finite scanning microdensitometer slit.
    Villafana T
    Med Phys; 1975; 2(5):251-4. PubMed ID: 1186630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Complex evaluation of film mammographic imaging systems. 2. Comparison of 18 systems using a signal-noise matrix].
    Friedrich M; Weskamp P
    Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 6429790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multiple-Sine-Slit Microdensitometer and MTF Evaluation for High Resolution Emulsions. 1: Theory and Mode of Operation.
    Johansson S; Biedermann K
    Appl Opt; 1974 Oct; 13(10):2280-7. PubMed ID: 20134676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Noise and Other Artifacts in OTF Derived from Image Scanning.
    Dutton D
    Appl Opt; 1975 Feb; 14(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 20134915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.