These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2033364)

  • 1. Generalized oddity performance in preschool children: a bimodal training procedure.
    Soraci SA; Deckner CW; Baumeister AA; Bryant JT; Mackay HA; Stoddard LT; McIlvane WJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1991 Apr; 51(2):280-95. PubMed ID: 2033364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oddity performance in preschool children at risk for mental retardation: transfer and maintenance.
    Soraci SA; Deckner CW; Haenlein M; Baumeister AA; Murata-Soraci K; Blanton RL
    Res Dev Disabil; 1987; 8(1):137-51. PubMed ID: 3659440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children's performance on "animal tests" of oddity: implications for cognitive processes required for tests of oddity and delayed nonmatch to sample.
    Overman W; Bachevalier J; Miller M; Moore K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Jul; 62(2):223-42. PubMed ID: 8683187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Oddity learning in developmentally delayed children: facilitation by means of familiar stimuli.
    Bryant JT; Deckner CW; Soraci SA; Baumeister AA; Blanton RL
    Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Sep; 93(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 3166801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Children's identity matching and oddity: assessing control by specific and general sample-comparison relations.
    Stromer R; Stromer JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Jan; 51(1):47-64. PubMed ID: 2921587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of identity versus Oddity pretraining on symmetric matching to sample.
    Boelens H; Schenk J
    Psychol Rep; 2009 Jun; 104(3):861-73. PubMed ID: 19708413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tactual learning and cross-modal transfer of an oddity problem in young children.
    Krekling S; Tellevik JM; Nordvik H
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1989 Feb; 47(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 2918276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Concurrent identity training is not necessary for associative symmetry in successive matching.
    Campos HC; Urcuioli PJ; Swisher M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Jan; 101(1):10-25. PubMed ID: 24436073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: II. Children.
    Pilgrim C; Chambers L; Galizio M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 May; 63(3):239-54. PubMed ID: 7751832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The development of category-based induction: reexamining conclusions from the induction then recognition (ITR) paradigm.
    Hayes BK; McKinnon R; Sweller N
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Sep; 44(5):1430-41. PubMed ID: 18793074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures.
    Saunders RR; Wachter J; Spradlin JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Jan; 49(1):95-115. PubMed ID: 3346622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Group differences and individual classification accuracy associated with letter/word oddity problems.
    Scott MS; Greenfield DB; Partridge MF; Gold S
    Am J Ment Retard; 1991 Jan; 95(4):404-16. PubMed ID: 2003910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning processes in matching and oddity: the oddity preference effect and sample reinforcement.
    Wright AA; Delius JD
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 16248729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concurrent learning of multiple oddity discrimination in rats.
    Taniuchi T; Miyazaki R; Siddik MAB
    Behav Processes; 2017 Jul; 140():6-15. PubMed ID: 28323077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Instructional control of generalized relational matching to sample in children.
    Lowenkron B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Nov; 52(3):293-309. PubMed ID: 2584916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A limitation on the law of effect.
    House BJ; Hanley MJ; Magid DF
    Am J Ment Defic; 1979 Sep; 84(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 495659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual discrimination learning in mentally handicapped adults: comparative effects of two-choice and multiple-choice training methods on stimulus generalization performance.
    Griffiths P; Boggan J; Tutt G; Dickens P
    J Ment Defic Res; 1985 Dec; 29 ( Pt 4)():347-57. PubMed ID: 4093962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional functioning and relational learning.
    Soraci SA; Deckner CW; Baumeister AA; Carlin MT
    Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Nov; 95(3):304-15. PubMed ID: 2261163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Category difference facilitates oddity learning in honeybees (Apis mellifera).
    Muszynski NM; Couvillon PA
    J Comp Psychol; 2020 Aug; 134(3):266-279. PubMed ID: 32463249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of conditional and equivalence relations without differential consequences.
    Harrison RJ; Green G
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Nov; 54(3):225-37. PubMed ID: 2103583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.