BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20333743)

  • 1. CO(2) laser fiber soft cochleostomy: development of a technique using human temporal bones and a guinea pig model.
    Fishman AJ; Moreno LE; Rivera A; Richter CP
    Lasers Surg Med; 2010 Mar; 42(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 20333743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modification and comparison of minimally invasive cochleostomy techniques: A pilot study.
    Cipolla MJ; Iyer P; Dome C; Welling DB; Bush ML
    Laryngoscope; 2012 May; 122(5):1142-7. PubMed ID: 22447373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noise exposure of the inner ear during drilling a cochleostomy for cochlear implantation.
    Pau HW; Just T; Bornitz M; Lasurashvilli N; Zahnert T
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Mar; 117(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 17334318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental study on thermic effects, morphology and function of guinea pig cochlea: a comparison between the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and carbon dioxide laser.
    Ren DD; Chi FL
    Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Aug; 40(6):407-14. PubMed ID: 18649384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Overview of Alternative Methods of Cochleostomy with Focus on Laser Ablative Techniques].
    Elsholz A; Böttcher A; Knecht R; Dalchow CV
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2015 Jul; 94(7):437-40. PubMed ID: 26125291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: in defence of cochleostomy and factors against the round window membrane approach.
    Addams-Williams J; Munaweera L; Coleman B; Shepherd R; Backhouse S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Aug; 12 Suppl 2():S36-9. PubMed ID: 21917217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of cochlear drilling with Piezosurgery Medical device in rats.
    Pawlowski KS; Koulich E; Cuda D; Wright CG; Stabilini E; Roland PS
    Laryngoscope; 2011 Jan; 121(1):182-6. PubMed ID: 21154673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy.
    Rowe D; Chambers S; Hampson A; Eastwood H; Campbell L; O'Leary S
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():49-57. PubMed ID: 26739790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomy of the middle-turn cochleostomy.
    Isaacson B; Roland PS; Wright CG
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Dec; 118(12):2200-4. PubMed ID: 18948831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and characterization of chemical cochleostomy in the Guinea pig.
    Alyono JC; Corrales CE; Huth ME; Blevins NH; Ricci AJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 Jun; 152(6):1113-8. PubMed ID: 25779472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of a corticosteroid (Triamcinolon) protects inner ear function after surgical intervention.
    Ye Q; Tillein J; Hartmann R; Gstoettner W; Kiefer J
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):361-9. PubMed ID: 17485985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preservation of basal inner ear structures in cochlear implantation.
    Adunka O; Gstoettner W; Hambek M; Unkelbach MH; Radeloff A; Kiefer J
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2004; 66(6):306-12. PubMed ID: 15668529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal bone investigations on landmarks for conventional or endosteal insertion of cochlear electrodes.
    Pau HW; Just T; Dommerich S; Behrend D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 127(9):920-6. PubMed ID: 17712669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode.
    Briggs RJ; Tykocinski M; Xu J; Risi F; Svehla M; Cowan R; Stover T; Erfurt P; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2006; 11 Suppl 1():42-8. PubMed ID: 17063010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A smart micro-drill for cochleostomy formation: a comparison of cochlear disturbances with manual drilling and a human trial.
    Coulson CJ; Assadi MZ; Taylor RP; Du X; Brett PN; Reid AP; Proops DW
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Mar; 14(2):98-106. PubMed ID: 22333534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An artificial temporal bone as a training tool for cochlear implantation.
    Roosli C; Sim JH; Möckel H; Mokosch M; Probst R
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1048-51. PubMed ID: 23820793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scala tympani cochleostomy II: topography and histology.
    Adunka OF; Radeloff A; Gstoettner WK; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Dec; 117(12):2195-200. PubMed ID: 17909447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of CO2 laser application to the guinea-pig cochlea on compound action potentials.
    Jovanovic S; Anft D; Schönfeld U; Berghaus A; Scherer H
    Am J Otol; 1999 Mar; 20(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 10100517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors influencing the efficacy of round window dexamethasone protection of residual hearing post-cochlear implant surgery.
    Chang A; Eastwood H; Sly D; James D; Richardson R; O'Leary S
    Hear Res; 2009 Sep; 255(1-2):67-72. PubMed ID: 19539739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Packing of the cochleostomy site affects auditory nerve response thresholds in precurved off-stylet cochlear implants.
    Gordin A; Papsin B; Gordon K
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Feb; 31(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 20101160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.