These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20334719)

  • 1. Explaining quantitative variation in the rate of Optional Infinitive errors across languages: a comparison of MOSAIC and the Variational Learning Model.
    Freudenthal D; Pine J; Gobet F
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):643-69. PubMed ID: 20334719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulating the cross-linguistic pattern of Optional Infinitive errors in children's declaratives and Wh- questions.
    Freudenthal D; Pine JM; Jones G; Gobet F
    Cognition; 2015 Oct; 143():61-76. PubMed ID: 26114904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling the Developmental Patterning of Finiteness Marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish Using MOSAIC.
    Freudenthal D; Pine JM; Aguado-Orea J; Gobet F
    Cogn Sci; 2007 Mar; 31(2):311-41. PubMed ID: 21635299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling the Development of Children's Use of Optional Infinitives in Dutch and English Using MOSAIC.
    Freudenthal D; Pine JM; Gobet F
    Cogn Sci; 2006 Mar; 30(2):277-310. PubMed ID: 21702816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicational markedness and frequency in constraint-based computational models of phonological learning.
    Jarosz G
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):565-606. PubMed ID: 20307347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variability, negative evidence, and the acquisition of verb argument constructions.
    Perfors A; Tenenbaum JB; Wonnacott E
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):607-42. PubMed ID: 20367896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Infinitives or bare stems? Are English-speaking children defaulting to the highest-frequency form?
    Räsänen SH; Ambridge B; Pine JM
    J Child Lang; 2014 Jul; 41(4):756-79. PubMed ID: 23830201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive architectures and language acquisition: a case study in pronoun comprehension.
    VAN Rij J; VAN Rijn H; Hendriks P
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):731-66. PubMed ID: 20353614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An empirical generative framework for computational modeling of language acquisition.
    Waterfall HR; Sandbank B; Onnis L; Edelman S
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):671-703. PubMed ID: 20420744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: the acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian.
    Westergaard M
    J Child Lang; 2009 Nov; 36(5):1023-51. PubMed ID: 19272194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Words in puddles of sound: modelling psycholinguistic effects in speech segmentation.
    Monaghan P; Christiansen MH
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):545-64. PubMed ID: 20307344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The input ambiguity hypothesis and case blindness: an account of cross-linguistic and intra-linguistic differences in case errors.
    Pelham SD
    J Child Lang; 2011 Mar; 38(2):235-72. PubMed ID: 20202289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Root infinitives in Dutch early child language: an effect of input?
    Wijnen F; Kempen M; Gillis S
    J Child Lang; 2001 Oct; 28(3):629-60. PubMed ID: 11797542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Building a unified model of the Optional Infinitive Stage: Simulating the cross-linguistic pattern of verb-marking error in typically developing children and children with Developmental Language Disorder.
    Pine JM; Freudenthal D; Gobet F
    J Child Lang; 2023 Nov; 50(6):1336-1352. PubMed ID: 36814394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Focusing on the relation: fewer exemplars facilitate children's initial verb learning and extension.
    Maguire MJ; Hirsh-Pasek K; Golinkoff RM; Brandone AC
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jul; 11(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 18576970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech.
    Rowland CF; Pine JM; Lieven EV; Theakston AL
    J Child Lang; 2003 Aug; 30(3):609-35. PubMed ID: 14513470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Overregularization in language acquisition.
    Marcus GF; Pinker S; Ullman M; Hollander M; Rosen TJ; Xu F
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1992; 57(4):1-182. PubMed ID: 1518508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Verbal inflection in the acquisition of Kuwaiti Arabic.
    Aljenaie K
    J Child Lang; 2010 Sep; 37(4):841-63. PubMed ID: 19912671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can input explain children's me-for-I errors?
    Kirjavainen M; Theakston A; Lieven E
    J Child Lang; 2009 Nov; 36(5):1091-114. PubMed ID: 19220924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predictors of morphosyntactic growth in typically developing toddlers: contributions of parent input and child sex.
    Hadley PA; Rispoli M; Fitzgerald C; Bahnsen A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Apr; 54(2):549-66. PubMed ID: 20719872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.