135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20335127)
1. [Value of ER, VIM, CEA and p16 detection in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas].
Hu WW; Tao JH; Li GM; Xu X; Yang XM
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Mar; 30(3):526-8, 531. PubMed ID: 20335127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas: is a 2-marker (Vim/CEA) panel enough?
Liao CL; Hsu JD; Lee MY; Kok LF; Li YJ; Wang PH; Yao CC; Han CP
Virchows Arch; 2010 Apr; 456(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 20221633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. p16 INK4 and CEA can be mutually exchanged with confidence between both relevant three-marker panels (ER/Vim/CEA and ER/Vim/p16 INK4) in distinguishing primary endometrial adenocarcinomas from endocervical adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
Han CP; Lee MY; Tyan YS; Kok LF; Yao CC; Wang PH; Hsu JD; Tseng SW
Virchows Arch; 2009 Oct; 455(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 19763614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential Diagnosis between Primary Endocervical and Endometrial Adenocarcinoma using Immunohistochemical Staining of Estrogen Receptor, Vimentin, Carcinoembryonic Antigen and p16.
Yanaranop M; Ayuwat S; Nakrangsee S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Feb; 99 Suppl 2():S106-15. PubMed ID: 27266224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ancillary p16(INK4a) adds no meaningful value to the performance of ER/PR/Vim/CEA panel in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
Yao CC; Kok LF; Lee MY; Wang PH; Wu TS; Tyan YS; Cheng YW; Kung MF; Han CP
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 19153755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adding the p16(INK4a) marker to the traditional 3-marker (ER/Vim/CEA) panel engenders no supplemental benefit in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
Han CP; Lee MY; Kok LF; Ruan A; Wu TS; Cheng YW; Tyan YS; Lin CY
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2009 Sep; 28(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 19696622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A panel of immunohistochemical stains, including carcinoembryonic antigen, vimentin, and estrogen receptor, aids the distinction between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas.
McCluggage WG; Sumathi VP; McBride HA; Patterson A
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2002 Jan; 21(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11781517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Progesterone receptor does not improve the performance and test effectiveness of the conventional 3-marker panel, consisting of estrogen receptor, vimentin and carcinoembryonic antigen in distinguishing between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray extension study.
Liao CL; Lee MY; Tyan YS; Kok LF; Wu TS; Koo CL; Wang PH; Chao KC; Han CP
J Transl Med; 2009 May; 7():37. PubMed ID: 19476621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A panel of 3 markers including p16, ProExC, or HPV ISH is optimal for distinguishing between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas.
Kong CS; Beck AH; Longacre TA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Jul; 34(7):915-26. PubMed ID: 20534993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A reappraisal of three-marker (ER/Vim/CEA), four-marker (ER/Vim/CEA/PR), and five-marker (ER/Vim/CEA/PR/p16INK4a) panels in the diagnostic distinction between primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
Han CP; Lee MY; Kok LF; Wu TS; Cheng YW; Wang PH; Yue CH; Tyan YS
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 May; 281(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 19847454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Endocervical adenocarcinomas with prominent endometrial or endomyometrial involvement simulating primary endometrial carcinomas: utility of HPV DNA detection and immunohistochemical expression of p16 and hormone receptors to confirm the cervical origin of the corpus tumor.
Yemelyanova A; Vang R; Seidman JD; Gravitt PE; Ronnett BM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jun; 33(6):914-24. PubMed ID: 19295407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. P16INK4a expression in undifferentiated carcinoma of the uterus does not exclude its endometrial origin.
Saad RS; Mashhour M; Noftech-Mozes S; Ismiil N; Dubé V; Ghorab Z; Faragalla H; Khalifa MA
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2012 Jan; 31(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 22123724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. p16 immunoreactivity may assist in the distinction between endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma.
McCluggage WG; Jenkins D
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2003 Jul; 22(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 12819388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinction between endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinoma: an immunohistochemical study.
Castrillon DH; Lee KR; Nucci MR
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2002 Jan; 21(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 11781516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ProExC is a novel marker for distinguishing between primary endometrial and endocervical adenocarcinomas.
Esheba GE
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2013 Jun; 25(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 23719407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scoring of p16(INK4a) immunohistochemistry based on independent nuclear staining alone can sufficiently distinguish between endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas in a tissue microarray study.
Han CP; Kok LF; Wang PH; Wu TS; Tyan YS; Cheng YW; Lee MY; Yang SF
Mod Pathol; 2009 Jun; 22(6):797-806. PubMed ID: 19347018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA and immunohistochemical expressions of p16, vimentin, ER, and PR in primary endocervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas.
Xiong Y; Xiong YY; Xu ZG
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2016 Aug; 37(4):517-521. PubMed ID: 29894077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immunoprofile of cervical and endometrial adenocarcinomas using a tissue microarray.
Alkushi A; Irving J; Hsu F; Dupuis B; Liu CL; Rijn M; Gilks CB
Virchows Arch; 2003 Mar; 442(3):271-7. PubMed ID: 12647218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Unusual endocervical adenocarcinomas: an immunohistochemical analysis with molecular detection of human papillomavirus.
Park KJ; Kiyokawa T; Soslow RA; Lamb CA; Oliva E; Zivanovic O; Juretzka MM; Pirog EC
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 May; 35(5):633-46. PubMed ID: 21490443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of p16 expression for distinction of uterine serous carcinomas from endometrial endometrioid and endocervical adenocarcinomas: immunohistochemical analysis of 201 cases.
Yemelyanova A; Ji H; Shih IeM; Wang TL; Wu LS; Ronnett BM
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Oct; 33(10):1504-14. PubMed ID: 19623034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
