These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2033541)

  • 1. Reduction of cervical gaps in class II composite resin restorations.
    Ericson D; Dérand T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 2033541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microhardness and porosity of Class 2 light-cured composite restorations cured with a transparent cone attached to the light-curing wand.
    Von Beetzen M; Li J; Nicander I; Sundström F
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8415161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of cavity design on gap formation in Class II composite resin restorations.
    Douvitsas G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Apr; 65(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 2066881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Hunecke A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increase of in vitro curing depth of class II composite resin restorations.
    Ericson D; Dérand T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Sep; 70(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 8410728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of light source position and bevel placement on facial margin adaptation of resin-based composite restorations.
    Hoelscher DC; Gregory WA; Linger JB; Pink FE
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):171-5. PubMed ID: 11763925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restoring class II cavities with composite resin, utilising the bulk filling technique.
    Lally U
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2014; 60(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 24812757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of bulk-fill base material on fracture strength of root-filled teeth restored with laminate resin composite restorations.
    Taha NA; Maghaireh GA; Ghannam AS; Palamara JE
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():60-64. PubMed ID: 28571830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction of cusp deflection resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage, using a light-transmitting cone.
    Ericson D; Paulsson L; Sowiak H; Dérand T
    Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Aug; 102(4):244-8. PubMed ID: 8091125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical evaluation of direct cuspal coverage with posterior composite resin restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(5):256-65; discussion 266-7. PubMed ID: 16987320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of various placement techniques on the microhardness of Class II (slot) resin composite restorations.
    Moosavi H; Abedini S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Sep; 10(5):E009-16. PubMed ID: 19838605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can pulpal floor debonding be detected from occlusal surface displacement in composite restorations?
    Novaes JB; Talma E; Las Casas EB; Aregawi W; Kolstad LW; Mantell S; Wang Y; Fok A
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jan; 34(1):161-169. PubMed ID: 29199007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro microleakage study of a condensable and flowable composite resin.
    Tung FF; Hsieh WW; Estafan D
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(6):711-5. PubMed ID: 12004668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique.
    Szep S; Frank H; Kenzel B; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 13(3):243-50; quiz 252. PubMed ID: 11360771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Saucer-shaped cavity preparation for composite resin restorations in class II carious lesions: three-year results.
    Nordbo H; Leirskar J; von der Fehr FR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Feb; 69(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 8429508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
    Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.