These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2033541)

  • 21. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations.
    Prakki A; Cilli R; Saad JO; Rodrigues JR
    Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):785-9. PubMed ID: 15553286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded class II resin composite restorations.
    Müllejans R; Badawi MO; Raab WH; Lang H
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 12670066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Class II composite restorations: importance of cervical enamel in vitro.
    Laegreid T; Gjerdet NR; Vult von Steyern P; Johansson AK
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 21777100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of volumetric shrinkage and curing light intensity on proximal contact tightness of class II resin composite restorations: in vitro study.
    El-Shamy H; Saber MH; Dörfer CE; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 22313267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Duplicating the form and function of posterior teeth with Class II resin-based composite.
    Christensen JJ
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):104-8; quiz 109-10. PubMed ID: 22414503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of different modes of light curing and resin composites on microleakage of Class II restorations.
    Hardan LS; Amm EW; Ghayad A
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2008 Dec; 31(124):27-34. PubMed ID: 19441264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The extent of polymerization of Class II light-cured composite resin restorations; effects of incremental placement technique, exposure time and heating for resin inlays.
    Hirabayashi S; Hood JA; Hirasawa T
    Dent Mater J; 1993 Dec; 12(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 8004910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
    Kim ME; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 133(10):1387-98. PubMed ID: 12403542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of accelerated restorative techniques on the microleakage of Class II composites.
    Uctasli S; Shortall AC; Burke FJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 12469751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Factors associated with microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations.
    Idriss S; Abduljabbar T; Habib C; Omar R
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 17288330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composites lined with flowable composites.
    Estafan D; Estafan A; Leinfelder KF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 11763929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Marginal adaptation of Class II composite fillings: guided polymerization vs reduced light intensity.
    Lösche GM
    J Adhes Dent; 1999; 1(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11725684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vivo interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable resin composite liner.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2005 Jun; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 15815923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effectiveness of different polymerization protocols for class II composite resin restorations.
    de Jong LC; Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JJ; Wolke JG; Geitenbeek B
    J Dent; 2007 Jun; 35(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 17383067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigation of polymerisation shrinkage strain, associated cuspal movement and microleakage of MOD cavities restored incrementally with resin-based composite using an LED light curing unit.
    Fleming GJ; Khan S; Afzal O; Palin WM; Burke FJ
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16842899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.