These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2033541)

  • 41. Class II composite resin restorations: a three-year clinical study of six different posterior composites.
    Lundin SA; Andersson B; Koch G; Rasmusson CG
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(3):105-14. PubMed ID: 2255989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A clinical evaluation of Class II composites placed using a decoupling technique.
    Wilson NH; Cowan AJ; Unterbrink G; Wilson MA; Crisp RJ
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(4):319-29. PubMed ID: 11317379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Microleakage of composite and two types of glass ionomer restorations with saliva contamination at different steps.
    Farmer SN; Ludlow SW; Donaldson ME; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 24717701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Role of delayed light polymerization of a dual-cured composite base on marginal adaptation of class II posterior composite open-sandwich restoration.
    Kamath U; Sheth H;
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):296. PubMed ID: 22945734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Bioactive glass fillers reduce bacterial penetration into marginal gaps for composite restorations.
    Khvostenko D; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Mitchell JC; Kruzic JJ
    Dent Mater; 2016 Jan; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 26621028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of root filled teeth restored with direct resin restorations.
    Taha NA; Palamara JE; Messer HH
    J Dent; 2011 Aug; 39(8):527-35. PubMed ID: 21620926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
    Fourie J; Smit CF
    SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Direct posterior composite restorations: simplified success through a systematic approach.
    Koczarski MJ; Corredor AC
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(1):87-94; quiz 96. PubMed ID: 11905163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Expediting Class II posterior composite placement.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2001 Oct; 20(10):96-8, 100-1. PubMed ID: 11665424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Alternative technique for class V resin composite restorations with minimum finishing/polishing procedures.
    Perez CR
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 20533640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Interferometric measurements of cusp deformation of teeth restored with composites.
    Suliman AA; Boyer DB; Lakes RS
    J Dent Res; 1993 Nov; 72(11):1532-6. PubMed ID: 8227705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A study of microleakage in Class II composite restorations using four different curing techniques.
    Gharizadeh N; Moradi K; Haghighizadeh MH
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 17695605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The clinical performance of a posterior composite resin restorative material, Heliomolar R.O.: 3-year report.
    Knibbs PJ; Smart ER
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 May; 19(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 1500966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
    Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
    J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Influence of the shape of the layers in photo-cured dental restorations on the shrinkage stress peaks-FEM study.
    Kowalczyk P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):e83-91. PubMed ID: 19786300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Creating tight proximal contacts for MOD resin composite restorations.
    Saber MH; El-Badrawy W; Loomans BA; Ahmed DR; Dörfer CE; El Zohairy A
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21740239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.