These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Slots vs pins: a comparison of retention under simulated chewing stresses. Outhwaite WC; Twiggs SW; Fairhurst CW; King GE J Dent Res; 1982 Feb; 61(2):400-2. PubMed ID: 6948858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations. Eberting JJ Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation. Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of preparation designs and adhesive systems on retention of class II amalgam restorations. Görücü J; Tiritoglu M; Ozgünaltay G J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9297640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of distribution of resistance features in complex amalgam restorations. Summitt JB; Rindler EA; Robbins JW; Burgess JO Oper Dent; 1994; 19(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8008611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of slot preparation length on the transverse strength of slot-retained restorations. McMaster DR; House RC; Anderson MH; Pelleu GB J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 1507128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Strength of amalgam restorations bonded with Amalgambond. Ianzano JA; Mastrodomenico J; Gwinnett AJ Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8329154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The retentive strength of slots with different width and depth versus pins. Chan CC; Chan KC J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Nov; 58(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 3479552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]