These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2033550)

  • 1. Retention design for amalgam restorations: pins versus slots.
    Bailey JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 2033550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention and resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Robbins JW; Burgess JO; Summitt JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Apr; 118(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 2651502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pin vs. slot retention in extensive amalgam restorations.
    Outhwaite WC; Garman TA; Pashley DH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1979 Apr; 41(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 284120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Slots vs pins: a comparison of retention under simulated chewing stresses.
    Outhwaite WC; Twiggs SW; Fairhurst CW; King GE
    J Dent Res; 1982 Feb; 61(2):400-2. PubMed ID: 6948858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review of the amalgapin technique for complex amalgam restorations.
    Eberting JJ
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):92-5. PubMed ID: 11199563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of preparation designs and adhesive systems on retention of class II amalgam restorations.
    Görücü J; Tiritoglu M; Ozgünaltay G
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Sep; 78(3):250-4. PubMed ID: 9297640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of distribution of resistance features in complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Rindler EA; Robbins JW; Burgess JO
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8008611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO; Alvarez A; Summitt JB
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Proximal Contact Repair of Complex Amalgam Restorations.
    Zguri MN; Casey JA; Jessup JP; Vandewalle KS
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):266-272. PubMed ID: 28080293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro resistance of extensive amalgam restorations using various retention methods.
    Plasmans PJ; Kusters ST; de Jonge BA; van 't Hof MA; Vrijhoef MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Jan; 57(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 3468247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Berry TG; Robbins JW; Osborne JW; Haveman CW
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture strength of amalgam crowns with repaired endodontic access.
    Hachmeister KA; Dunn WJ; Murchison DF; Larsen RB
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 12022456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of grooves on resistance/retention form of Class 2 approximal slot amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Osborne JW; Burgess JO
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):209-13. PubMed ID: 8152991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of resistance features for complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB; Burgess JO; Kaiser DA; Rux HW; Dutton FB
    Am J Dent; 1991 Dec; 4(6):268-72. PubMed ID: 1814348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cavity design and marginal degradation of the occlusal part of Class-II amalgam restorations.
    Jokstad A; Mjör IA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1990 Dec; 48(6):389-97. PubMed ID: 2288211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Coronal reinforcement with cross-splinted pin-amalgam restorations.
    Lambert RL; Robinson FB; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Sep; 54(3):346-9. PubMed ID: 3864972
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of slot preparation length on the transverse strength of slot-retained restorations.
    McMaster DR; House RC; Anderson MH; Pelleu GB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Apr; 67(4):472-7. PubMed ID: 1507128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strength of amalgam restorations bonded with Amalgambond.
    Ianzano JA; Mastrodomenico J; Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1993 Feb; 6(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 8329154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The retentive strength of slots with different width and depth versus pins.
    Chan CC; Chan KC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Nov; 58(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 3479552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.