These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20338655)

  • 1. Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals.
    Patterson JT; Carter M
    Hum Mov Sci; 2010 Apr; 29(2):214-27. PubMed ID: 20338655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context.
    Patterson JT; Carter M; Sanli E
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2011 Dec; 82(4):624-33. PubMed ID: 22276404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-controlled KR schedules: does repetition order matter?
    Patterson JT; Carter MJ; Hansen S
    Hum Mov Sci; 2013 Aug; 32(4):567-79. PubMed ID: 24054895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Self-controlled knowledge of results: age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection.
    Carter MJ; Patterson JT
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Dec; 31(6):1459-72. PubMed ID: 23164628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing Knowledge of Results About Relative Versus Absolute Timing: Differential Effects on Learning.
    Wulf G; Lee TD; Schmidt RA
    J Mot Behav; 1994 Dec; 26(4):362-369. PubMed ID: 12719193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Average KR schedule in learning of timing: influence of length for summary knowledge of results and task complexity.
    Ishikura T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Dec; 101(3):911-24. PubMed ID: 16491697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not enhance the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules.
    Carter MJ; Smith V; Carlsen AN; Ste-Marie DM
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):496-506. PubMed ID: 28243728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feedback schedules for motor-skill learning: the similarities and differences between physical and observational practice.
    Badets A; Blandin Y
    J Mot Behav; 2010; 42(4):257-68. PubMed ID: 20862778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. External Control of Knowledge of Results: Learner Involvement Enhances Motor Skill Transfer.
    Figueiredo LS; Ugrinowitsch H; Freire AB; Shea JB; Benda RN
    Percept Mot Skills; 2018 Apr; 125(2):400-416. PubMed ID: 29350078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of erroneous knowledge of results on transfer of anticipation timing.
    McNevin N; Magill RA; Buekers MJ
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1994 Dec; 65(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 7886281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of frequency of feedback on the learning of motor skill in individuals with cerebral palsy.
    Hemayattalab R; Rostami LR
    Res Dev Disabil; 2010; 31(1):212-7. PubMed ID: 19864110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Average-KR schedule benefits generalized motor program learning.
    Yao WX
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Aug; 97(1):185-91. PubMed ID: 14604038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-controlled feedback: does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it?
    Chiviacowsky S; Wulf G
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2002 Dec; 73(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 12495242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory model enhances relative-timing learning.
    Lai Q; Shea CH; Bruechert L; Little M
    J Mot Behav; 2002 Sep; 34(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 19260180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-regulated frequency of augmented information in skill learning.
    Patterson JT; Lee TD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 20384416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observational learning: effects of bandwidth knowledge of results.
    Badets A; Blandin Y
    J Mot Behav; 2005 May; 37(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 15883118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On Whether Task Experience of the Peer Differentially Impacts Feedback Scheduling and Skill Acquisition of a Learner.
    Patterson JT; McRae M; Hansen S
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1987. PubMed ID: 31551863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Motor learning as a function of KR schedule and characteristics of task-intrinsic feedback.
    Anderson DI; Magill RA; Sekiya H
    J Mot Behav; 2001 Mar; 33(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 11265058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Erroneous knowledge of results affects decision and memory processes on timing tasks.
    Ryan LJ; Fritz MS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1468-82. PubMed ID: 18085957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Knowing the good from the bad: does being aware of KR content matter?
    Patterson JT; Azizieh J
    Hum Mov Sci; 2012 Dec; 31(6):1449-58. PubMed ID: 22682775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.