These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20338906)

  • 1. Sequential meta-analysis: an efficient decision-making tool.
    van der Tweel I; Bollen C
    Clin Trials; 2010 Apr; 7(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 20338906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis.
    Wetterslev J; Thorlund K; Brok J; Gluud C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 61(1):64-75. PubMed ID: 18083463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comments on 'Sequential meta-analysis: an efficient decision-making tool' by I van der Tweel and C Bollen.
    Thorlund K; Imberger G; Wetterslev J; Brok J; Gluud C
    Clin Trials; 2010 Dec; 7(6):752-3; author reply 754. PubMed ID: 21138922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses.
    Brok J; Thorlund K; Gluud C; Wetterslev J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):763-9. PubMed ID: 18411040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Apparently conclusive meta-analyses may be inconclusive--Trial sequential analysis adjustment of random error risk due to repetitive testing of accumulating data in apparently conclusive neonatal meta-analyses.
    Brok J; Thorlund K; Wetterslev J; Gluud C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):287-98. PubMed ID: 18824466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.
    Goudie AC; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Donald A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):983-91. PubMed ID: 20573483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection criteria and generalizability within the counterfactual framework: explaining the paradox of antidepressant-induced suicidality?
    Weisberg HI; Hayden VC; Pontes VP
    Clin Trials; 2009 Apr; 6(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 19342462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
    Tierney JF; Stewart LA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of meta-analysis in monitoring clinical trials.
    Begg CB
    Stat Med; 1996 Jun; 15(12):1299-306; discussion 1307-11. PubMed ID: 8817803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sequential meta-analysis of single-case experimental data.
    Kuppens S; Heyvaert M; Van den Noortgate W; Onghena P
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):720-9. PubMed ID: 21455830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does treatment effect depend on control event rate? Revisiting a meta-analysis of suicidality and antidepressant use in children.
    Proschan MA; Brittain EH; Fay MP
    Clin Trials; 2010 Apr; 7(2):109-17; discussion 118-120. PubMed ID: 20338902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
    Jansen JP; Fleurence R; Devine B; Itzler R; Barrett A; Hawkins N; Lee K; Boersma C; Annemans L; Cappelleri JC
    Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):417-28. PubMed ID: 21669366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can trial sequential monitoring boundaries reduce spurious inferences from meta-analyses?
    Thorlund K; Devereaux PJ; Wetterslev J; Guyatt G; Ioannidis JP; Thabane L; Gluud LL; Als-Nielsen B; Gluud C
    Int J Epidemiol; 2009 Feb; 38(1):276-86. PubMed ID: 18824467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Graphical methods for detecting bias in meta-analysis.
    Ferrer RL
    Fam Med; 1998 Sep; 30(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 9773289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A meta-regression analysis shows no impact of design characteristics on outcome in trials on tension-type headaches.
    Verhagen AP; de Vet HC; Willemsen S; Stijnen T
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Aug; 61(8):813-8. PubMed ID: 18359608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factorial design provides evidence to guide practice of anaesthesia.
    Korttila K; Apfel CC
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2005 Aug; 49(7):927-9. PubMed ID: 16045652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Size of treatment effects and their importance to clinical research and practice.
    Kraemer HC; Kupfer DJ
    Biol Psychiatry; 2006 Jun; 59(11):990-6. PubMed ID: 16368078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
    Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.