These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20338937)

  • 1. A pilot study evaluating an intervention designed to raise awareness of clinical trials among potential participants in the developing world.
    Dhai A; Etheredge H; Cleaton-Jones P
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Apr; 36(4):238-42. PubMed ID: 20338937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consent in clinical trials: what do patients know?
    Hereu P; Pérez E; Fuentes I; Vidal X; Suñé P; Arnau JM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):443-6. PubMed ID: 20462521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the impact of a patient clinical trials handbook among pharmacy students.
    Graham AC; Raisch DW; Fye CL; Sather MR
    Clin Ther; 2005 Feb; 27(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 15811487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing an alternate informed consent process.
    Yates BC; Dodendorf D; Lane J; LaFramboise L; Pozehl B; Duncan K; Knodel K
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 19289935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Levels of knowledge and perceived understanding among participants in cancer clinical trials - factors related to the informed consent procedure.
    Bergenmar M; Johansson H; Wilking N
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 21109583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients' understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials.
    Behrendt C; Gölz T; Roesler C; Bertz H; Wünsch A
    J Med Ethics; 2011 Feb; 37(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 21098797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Process for obtaining informed consent: women's opinions.
    Bento SF; Hardy E; Osis MJ
    Dev World Bioeth; 2008 Dec; 8(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 19046257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Pre-randomisation in study designs: getting past the taboo].
    Schellings R; Kessels AG; Sturmans F
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2053-6. PubMed ID: 18837179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The need for uncertainty in clinical research. Equipoise].
    Rodrigues HC; Oerlemans AJ; van den Berg PP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(49):A3846. PubMed ID: 22166179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of informed consent: a pilot study.
    Länsimies-Antikainen H; Pietilä AM; Laitinen T; Schwab U; Rauramaa R; Länsimies E
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Jul; 59(2):146-54. PubMed ID: 17543012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recall of informed consent information by healthy volunteers in clinical trials.
    Fortun P; West J; Chalkley L; Shonde A; Hawkey C
    QJM; 2008 Aug; 101(8):625-9. PubMed ID: 18487271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The experiences of children enrolled in pediatric oncology research: implications for assent.
    Unguru Y; Sill AM; Kamani N
    Pediatrics; 2010 Apr; 125(4):e876-83. PubMed ID: 20351001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of a clinical trials information handbook on patient knowledge, perceptions, and likelihood of participation.
    Campbell HM; Raisch DW; Sather MR; Segal AR; Warren SR; Naik R
    IRB; 2008; 30(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 18306954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research.
    Jeste DV; Palmer BW; Appelbaum PS; Golshan S; Glorioso D; Dunn LB; Kim K; Meeks T; Kraemer HC
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 64(8):966-74. PubMed ID: 17679641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An international pilot study of an Internet-based platform to facilitate clinical research in epilepsy: the EpiNet project.
    Bergin P; Sadleir L; Legros B; Mogal Z; Tripathi M; Dang N; Beretta S; Zanchi C; Burneo J; Borkowski T; Cho YJ; Ossemann M; Striano P; Srivastava K; Tan HJ; Wanigasinghe J; D'Souza W;
    Epilepsia; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1829-35. PubMed ID: 22958055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The many ways of saying yes and no: reflections on the research coordinator's role in recruiting research participants and obtaining informed consent.
    Huntington I; Robinson W
    IRB; 2007; 29(3):6-10. PubMed ID: 17847636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A "novel" intervention: a pilot study of children's literature and healthy lifestyles.
    Bravender T; Russell A; Chung RJ; Armstrong SC
    Pediatrics; 2010 Mar; 125(3):e513-7. PubMed ID: 20142279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What should research participants understand to understand they are participants in research?
    Wendler D; Grady C
    Bioethics; 2008 May; 22(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 18405318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-recruitment confirmation of informed consent by SMS.
    Gulbrandsen P; Jensen BF
    J Med Ethics; 2010 Feb; 36(2):126-8. PubMed ID: 20133410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.