These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20339373)

  • 61. Estimating central SBP from the peripheral pulse: influence of waveform analysis and calibration error.
    Guilcher A; Brett S; Munir S; Clapp B; Chowienczyk PJ
    J Hypertens; 2011 Jul; 29(7):1357-66. PubMed ID: 21558956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Impact of calibration on estimates of central blood pressures.
    Soender TK; Van Bortel LM; Møller JE; Lambrechtsen J; Hangaard J; Egstrup K
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Dec; 26(12):706-10. PubMed ID: 22048713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A comparison between central blood pressure values obtained by the Gaon system and the SphygmoCor system.
    Kang JH; Lee DI; Kim S; Kim SW; Im SI; Na JO; Choi CU; Lim HE; Kim JW; Kim EJ; Han SW; Rha SW; Seo HS; Oh DJ; Park CG
    Hypertens Res; 2012 Mar; 35(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 22158112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Central aortic blood pressure assessment and cardiovascular risk.
    Ram CV
    Indian Heart J; 2010; 62(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 21180028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Peripheral augmentation index defines the relationship between central and peripheral pulse pressure.
    Munir S; Guilcher A; Kamalesh T; Clapp B; Redwood S; Marber M; Chowienczyk P
    Hypertension; 2008 Jan; 51(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 17998476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Wave reflection and central aortic pressure are increased in response to static and dynamic muscle contraction at comparable workloads.
    Edwards DG; Mastin CR; Kenefick RW
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2008 Feb; 104(2):439-45. PubMed ID: 18079263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Validation of oscillometric pulse wave analysis measurements in children.
    Stoner L; Lambrick DM; Westrupp N; Young J; Faulkner J
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Jun; 27(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 24390294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Central aortic blood pressure estimation in children and adolescents: results of the KidCoreBP study.
    Mynard JP; Goldsmith G; Springall G; Eastaugh L; Lane GK; Zannino D; Smolich JJ; Avolio A; Cheung MMH
    J Hypertens; 2020 May; 38(5):821-828. PubMed ID: 31790068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Validation of the central blood pressure estimation by the SphygmoCor system in Chinese.
    Zuo JL; Li Y; Yan ZJ; Zhang RY; Shen WF; Zhu DL; Gao PJ; Chu SL
    Blood Press Monit; 2010 Oct; 15(5):268-74. PubMed ID: 20357649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparison of invasive and brachial cuff-based noninvasive measurements for the assessment of blood pressure amplification.
    Nakagomi A; Okada S; Shoji T; Kobayashi Y
    Hypertens Res; 2017 Mar; 40(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27761001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Development and validation of a novel method to derive central aortic systolic pressure from the radial pressure waveform using an n-point moving average method.
    Williams B; Lacy PS; Yan P; Hwee CN; Liang C; Ting CM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Feb; 57(8):951-61. PubMed ID: 21329842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Central blood pressure estimation by using N-point moving average method in the brachial pulse wave.
    Sugawara R; Horinaka S; Yagi H; Ishimura K; Honda T
    Hypertens Res; 2015 May; 38(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 25693855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Central Pressure Appraisal: Clinical Validation of a Subject-Specific Mathematical Model.
    Tosello F; Guala A; Leone D; Camporeale C; Bruno G; Ridolfi L; Veglio F; Milan A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151523. PubMed ID: 27010562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Noninvasive determination of systolic, diastolic and end-systolic blood pressure in neonates, infants and young children: comparison with central aortic pressure measurements.
    Colan SD; Fujii A; Borow KM; MacPherson D; Sanders SP
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Oct; 52(7):867-70. PubMed ID: 6624679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Central Blood Pressure Monitoring via a Standard Automatic Arm Cuff.
    Natarajan K; Cheng HM; Liu J; Gao M; Sung SH; Chen CH; Hahn JO; Mukkamala R
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):14441. PubMed ID: 29089581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Method for noninvasive measurement of central aortic systolic pressure.
    Marmor AT; Blondheim DS; Gozlan E; Navo E; Front D
    Clin Cardiol; 1987 Apr; 10(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 3581530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Estimation of central aortic blood pressure: a systematic meta-analysis of available techniques.
    Narayan O; Casan J; Szarski M; Dart AM; Meredith IT; Cameron JD
    J Hypertens; 2014 Sep; 32(9):1727-40. PubMed ID: 24937639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Validation of an Adaptive Transfer Function Method to Estimate the Aortic Pressure Waveform.
    Yao Y; Xu L; Sun Y; Fu Q; Zhou S; He D; Zhang Y; Guo L; Zheng D
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2017 Nov; 21(6):1599-1606. PubMed ID: 28114042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Peripheral blood pressure measurement is as good as applanation tonometry at predicting ascending aortic blood pressure.
    Davies JI; Band MM; Pringle S; Ogston S; Struthers AD
    J Hypertens; 2003 Mar; 21(3):571-6. PubMed ID: 12640251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Central Aortic Systolic Blood Pressure Exhibits Advantages Over Brachial Blood Pressure Measurements in Chronic Kidney Disease Risk Prediction in Women.
    Zhang L; Wang Z; Chen Z; Wang X; Tian Y; Shao L; Zhu M
    Kidney Blood Press Res; 2018; 43(4):1375-1387. PubMed ID: 30153665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.