These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20339708)
21. Time-dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures. Calt S; Serper A J Endod; 2002 Jan; 28(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 11806642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. NaOCl and EDTA irrigating solutions for endodontics: SEM findings. Franchi M; Eppinger F; Filippini GF; Montanari G Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 1992; 35(3-4):93-7. PubMed ID: 1297475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of different irrigation protocols on elastic modulus of dentine and biomechanics of single-rooted premolar tooth: A nano-indentation and finite element analysis study. Durmus B; Hale AA; Oguz E; Sema B Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jan; 22(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30666027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of the effect of four final irrigation protocols on root canal dentin components by polarized light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Baldasso FER; Cardoso LR; Silva VDD; Morgental RD; Kopper PMP Microsc Res Tech; 2017 Dec; 80(12):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 28925588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Efficacy of various root canal irrigants on removal of smear layer in the primary root canals after hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopy study. Hariharan VS; Nandlal B; Srilatha KT J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 21273715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Light and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of Glyde File Prep in smear layer removal. Lim TS; Wee TY; Choi MY; Koh WC; Sae-Lim V Int Endod J; 2003 May; 36(5):336-43. PubMed ID: 12752647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparative scanning electron microscopy evaluation of smear layer removal with apple vinegar and sodium hypochlorite associated with EDTA. Candeiro GT; Matos IB; Costa CF; Fonteles CS; Vale MS J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 22231000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Smear layer removal capacity of disinfectant solutions used with and without EDTA for the irrigation of canals: a SEM study. Menezes AC; Zanet CG; Valera MC Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2003; 17(4):349-55. PubMed ID: 15107918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Peracetic acid as a single endodontic irrigant: effects on microhardness, roughness and erosion of root canal dentin. Keine KC; Kuga MC; Coaguila-Llerena H; Palma-Dibb RG; Faria G Microsc Res Tech; 2020 Apr; 83(4):375-380. PubMed ID: 31833180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of various irrigation/aspiration protocols on cleaning of flattened root canals. Mendonça DH; Colucci V; Rached-Junior FJ; Miranda CE; Silva-Sousa YT; Silva SR Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26154369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of calcium hydroxide and four irrigation regimens on instrumented and uninstrumented canal wall topography. Tatsuta CT; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC; Adey JD J Endod; 1999 Feb; 25(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 10204464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Debris remaining in the apical third of root canals after chemomechanical preparation by using sodium hypochlorite and glyde: an in vivo study. Cruz A; Vera J; Gascón G; Palafox-Sánchez CA; Amezcua O; Mercado G J Endod; 2014 Sep; 40(9):1419-23. PubMed ID: 25146024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution and gel for smear layer removal. Dotto SR; Travassos RM; de Oliveira EP; Machado ME; Martins JL Aust Endod J; 2007 Aug; 33(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 17697246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate and its effect on root dentin. Bui TB; Baumgartner JC; Mitchell JC J Endod; 2008 Feb; 34(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 18215677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation. Pérez-Heredia M; Ferrer-Luque CM; González-Rodríguez MP J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):993-7. PubMed ID: 16982281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Smear layer removal by auxiliary chemical substances in biomechanical preparation: a scanning electron microscope study. Carvalho AS; Camargo CH; Valera MC; Camargo SE; Mancini MN J Endod; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1396-1400. PubMed ID: 18928856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the efficacy of Smear Clear with and without a canal brush in smear layer and debris removal from instrumented root canal using WaveOne versus ProTaper: a scanning electron microscopic study. Kamel WH; Kataia EM J Endod; 2014 Mar; 40(3):446-50. PubMed ID: 24565669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the effect of four decalcifying agents combined with 60°C 3% sodium hypochlorite on smear layer removal. Wu L; Mu Y; Deng X; Zhang S; Zhou D J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):381-4. PubMed ID: 22341079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of EDTA, sodium, and calcium hypochlorite on the inorganic component of root canal dentin: A SEM analysis. Cardoso LR; Baldasso FER; Delai D; Montagner F; Kopper PMP Microsc Res Tech; 2019 Feb; 82(2):128-133. PubMed ID: 30582246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Efficacy of flowable gel-type EDTA at removing the smear layer and inorganic debris under manual dynamic activation. Kim HJ; Park SJ; Park SH; Hwang YC; Yu MK; Min KS J Endod; 2013 Jul; 39(7):910-4. PubMed ID: 23791262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]