These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20339714)

  • 1. Facial harmony in orthodontic diagnosis and planning.
    Paiva JB; Attizzani MF; Miasiro Júnior H; Rino Neto J
    Braz Oral Res; 2010; 24(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 20339714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skeletal-versus soft-tissue-based cephalometric analyses: is the correlation reproducible?
    Ploder O; Köhnke R; Winsauer H; Götz C; Bissinger O; Haller B; Kolk A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Mar; 77(2):135-141. PubMed ID: 30394163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic Indicators for Anterior Mandibular Repositioning in Adolescents with Class II Malocclusion: A Cross-Sectional Cephalometric Study.
    Chae JM; Park JH; Kim SH; Mangal U; Seo HY
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2020 Aug; 44(4):274-282. PubMed ID: 33167022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative evaluation of cephalometric occlusal characteristics between the long face pattern and pattern I.
    de Oliveira EG; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(3):86-93. PubMed ID: 24094016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facial soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment.
    Aksakalli S; Demir A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2014; 17(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24714003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis.
    Bergman RT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):373-89. PubMed ID: 10511665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Male and Female Characteristics of Facial Soft Tissue Thickness in Different Orthodontic Malocclusions Evaluated by Cephalometric Radiography.
    Perović T; Blažej Z
    Med Sci Monit; 2018 May; 24():3415-3424. PubMed ID: 29791323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial and dental alterations according to the breathing pattern.
    Retamoso LB; Knop LA; Guariza Filho O; Tanaka OM
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Apr; 19(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 21552720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
    Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A study of the harmonious profile in facial esthetics. Part 1. Descriptive statistics.
    Nomura M; Tochikura M; Konishi H; Suzuki T; Sebata M; Isshiki Y
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1999 Feb; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 10522176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy and clinical validity of automated cephalometric analysis using convolutional neural networks.
    Kang S; Kim I; Kim YJ; Kim N; Baek SH; Sung SJ
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2024 Feb; 27(1):64-77. PubMed ID: 37326233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of lower facial esthetics in females with different skeletal patterns].
    Zhang KK; Yang SY; Geng YD; Xiao WW; Peng HZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 55(6):388-393. PubMed ID: 32486568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cephalometric evaluation of soft tissue in orthodontic treatment planning].
    Currò G; Seidita R
    Mondo Ortod; 1989; 14(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 2639232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthodontic treatment planning: do orthodontists treat to cephalometric norms?
    Al-Balkhi KM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Nov; 4(4):12-27. PubMed ID: 14625592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Facial soft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment.
    Nanda RS; Ghosh J
    Semin Orthod; 1995 Jun; 1(2):67-81. PubMed ID: 8935046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial soft tissue thickness differences among different vertical facial patterns.
    Saadeh M; Fayyad-Kazan H; Haddad R; Ayoub F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110468. PubMed ID: 32971443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nasion true vertical: a proposed method for testing the clinical validity of cephalometric measurements applied to a new cephalometric reference line.
    Michiels LY; Tourne LP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1990; 5(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 2373912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Heritability of Facial Skeletal and Dental Characteristics of Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins Using Cephalometric Analysis and Falconer's Method.
    Kim E; Sung J; Song YM; Chae HS; Mo SS; Kim YH; Baek SH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 May; 29(3):e274-e279. PubMed ID: 29419588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation Between Cephalometric Measures and End-of-Treatment Facial Attractiveness.
    Yu XN; Bai D; Feng X; Liu YH; Chen WJ; Li S; Han GL; Jiang RP; Xu TM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 26872281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Soft tissue changes of patients with skeletal class II malocclusion after orthodontic and surgical treatments].
    Chen K; Zheng Y; Wang X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Feb; 20(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 12593199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.