These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2034440)

  • 1. A program to improve mammography skills of practicing radiologic technologists.
    Gaw VP; Bush SM; D'Orsi CJ; Costanza ME; Karellas A; Dowd M; Zapka JG
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1991 Feb; 17(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 2034440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms.
    Bassett LW; Hollatz-Brown AJ; Bastani R; Pearce JG; Hirji K; Chen L
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):189-92. PubMed ID: 7997550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technologists' Characteristics and Quality of Positioning in Daily Practice in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Guertin MH; Théberge I; Zomahoun HT; Dufresne MP; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 27567127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of radiographers in mammogram interpretation: a systematic review.
    van den Biggelaar FJ; Nelemans PJ; Flobbe K
    Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 17764941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and implementation of a quality assurance program for mammography.
    de Paredes ES; Frazier AB; Hartwell GD; Strash AM; Scheer C; Smith DC; Barnette PA; Noel W; Kenneweg D
    Radiology; 1987 Apr; 163(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 3823463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assurance in follow-up and initial treatment for screening mammography programs in 22 countries.
    Klabunde CN; Sancho-Garnier H; Taplin S; Thoresen S; Ohuchi N; Ballard-Barbash R;
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Dec; 14(6):449-61. PubMed ID: 12515331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography and the training program of the American College of Radiology.
    Scott WG
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1967 Apr; 99(4):1002-8. PubMed ID: 6067246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. I.S.R.R.T. breast screening recommendations. International Society of Radiographers and Radiological Technicians.
    Can J Med Radiat Technol; 1991 Mar; 22(1):16-7. PubMed ID: 10110352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Competency assessment for radiology.
    Sferrella SM
    Radiol Manage; 1995; 17(3):65-79. PubMed ID: 10144831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assurance in mammography. Accreditation, legislation, and compliance with quality assurance standards.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 1732931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterizing the Mammography Technologist Workforce in North Carolina.
    Henderson LM; Marsh MW; Benefield T; Pearsall E; Durham D; Schroeder BF; Bowling JM; Viglione CA; Yankaskas BC
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Dec; 12(12 Pt B):1419-26. PubMed ID: 26614888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography quality assurance. Current issues.
    Hendrick RE
    Cancer; 1993 Aug; 72(4 Suppl):1466-74. PubMed ID: 8339240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The inter-observer variability of breast density scoring between mammography technologists and breast radiologists and its effect on the rate of adjuvant ultrasound.
    Mazor RD; Savir A; Gheorghiu D; Weinstein Y; Abadi-Korek I; Shabshin N
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):957-62. PubMed ID: 27130056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the quality of mammographic breast positioning: a quality improvement study.
    Rouette J; Elfassy N; Bouganim N; Yin H; Lasry N; Azoulay L
    CMAJ Open; 2021; 9(2):E607-E612. PubMed ID: 34088731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. I know that continuing medical education is now required for technologists performing mammography. What kind of courses should I be looking for, and what should I be learning?
    Botsco MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1260. PubMed ID: 7976912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The competency question.
    Ruthemeyer M
    Radiol Manage; 2000; 22(5):20-8. PubMed ID: 11151318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assurance in breast cancer screening.
    Grey JA
    Aust Clin Rev; 1988 Dec; 8(31):177-80. PubMed ID: 3240138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 years.
    Miller AB; To T; Baines CJ; Wall C
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):305-12. PubMed ID: 12204013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.