203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2034450)
21. Glaucoma case finding: a cluster-randomised intervention trial.
Theodossiades J; Murdoch I; Cousens S
Eye (Lond); 2004 May; 18(5):483-90. PubMed ID: 15131679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Australian general medical practitioner referral pathways for people with different ocular conditions.
Jamous KF; Jalbert I; Kalloniatis M; Boon MY
Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Mar; 97(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 23944239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optometric practice in Norway: a cross-sectional nationwide study.
Sundling V; Gulbrandsen P; Bragadottir R; Bakketeig LS; Jervell J; Straand J
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Sep; 85(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 17408386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ophthalmologic confirmation of referrals for suspected cases of glaucoma initiated by optometrists.
Spry PG
Eye (Lond); 2000 Dec; 14(Pt 6):925-7. PubMed ID: 11584868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The false negative rate and the role for virtual review in a nationally evaluated glaucoma referral refinement scheme.
Ratnarajan G; Kean J; French K; Parker M; Bourne R
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 26088949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Optometrists referrals for glaucoma assessment: a prospective survey of clinical data and outcomes.
Lockwood AJ; Kirwan JF; Ashleigh Z
Eye (Lond); 2010 Sep; 24(9):1515-9. PubMed ID: 20559331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of referral refinement on management of glaucoma suspects in Australia.
Huang J; Yapp M; Hennessy MP; Ly A; Masselos K; Agar A; Kalloniatis M; Zangerl B
Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):675-683. PubMed ID: 31852027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of glaucoma referral refinement criteria on referral to, and first-visit discharge rates from, the hospital eye service: the Health Innovation & Education Cluster (HIEC) Glaucoma Pathways project.
Ratnarajan G; Newsom W; French K; Kean J; Chang L; Parker M; Garway-Heath DF; Bourne RR
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 23406492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Peterborough scheme for community specialist optometrists in glaucoma: a feasibility study.
Syam P; Rughani K; Vardy SJ; Rimmer T; Fitt A; Husain T; McInerney L; Broome D; Driver R; Wormald R; Ramirez-Florez S
Eye (Lond); 2010 Jul; 24(7):1156-64. PubMed ID: 20186167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Non-contact tonometry: optometrists' current practice in England and Wales.
Tuck MW; Crick RP
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1994 Oct; 14(4):347-50. PubMed ID: 7845690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Outcome of referrals by optometrists to general practitioners: an 18 month study in one practice.
Perkins P
Br J Gen Pract; 1990 Feb; 40(331):59-61. PubMed ID: 2107852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does training clinic nurses to test pinhole visual acuity as a screen for glaucoma increase glaucoma referrals to eye care professionals? A pilot study in Malawi.
Dean WH; Courtright P; Cook C
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 19(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 22978530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Community optometrist referral of those aged 65 and over for raised IOP post-NICE: AOP guidance versus joint college guidance--an epidemiological model using BEAP.
Vernon SA; Hillman JG; Macnab HK; Bacon P; van der Hoek J; Vernon OK; Bhargarva A
Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 95(11):1534-6. PubMed ID: 21310800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An analysis of referral routes and diagnostic accuracy in cases of suspected glaucoma.
Sheldrick JH; Ng C; Austin DJ; Rosenthal AR
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 1994 Mar; 1(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 8790611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optometric glaucoma referrals--measures of effectiveness and implications for screening strategy.
Gilchrist J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Nov; 20(6):452-63. PubMed ID: 11127125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical model assisting with the collaborative care of glaucoma patients and suspects.
Jamous KF; Kalloniatis M; Hennessy MP; Agar A; Hayen A; Zangerl B
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015; 43(4):308-19. PubMed ID: 25362898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Can a community optometrist-based referral refinement scheme reduce false-positive glaucoma hospital referrals without compromising quality of care? The community and hospital allied network glaucoma evaluation scheme (CHANGES).
Bourne RR; French KA; Chang L; Borman AD; Hingorani M; Newsom WD
Eye (Lond); 2010 May; 24(5):881-7. PubMed ID: 19648892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The diagnostic outcome of new glaucoma referrals.
Bell RW; O'Brien C
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 9135805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ophthalmology referrals from optometry: a comparative study (the R.O.C.S study).
McLaughlin CR; Biehl M; Chan BJ; Mullen SJ; Zhao L; Donaldson L; Sivachandran N; Moinul P; Barbosa J; Chaudhary V
Can J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 53(5):491-496. PubMed ID: 30340717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Glaucoma referral refinement in Ireland: managing the sensitivity-specificity paradox in optometric practice.
Barrett C; O'Brien C; Loughman J
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Jul; 38(4):400-410. PubMed ID: 29492992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
