These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20345404)

  • 1. Mapping human and social dimensions of conservation opportunity for the scheduling of conservation action on private land.
    Knight AT; Cowling RM; Difford M; Campbell BM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1348-58. PubMed ID: 20345404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
    Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating private land conservation in the Cape Lowlands, South Africa.
    Von Hase A; Rouget M; Cowling RM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1182-9. PubMed ID: 21182668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions.
    Raymond CM; Brown G
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2513-23. PubMed ID: 21664035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Designing cost-effective payments for conservation measures to generate spatiotemporal habitat heterogeneity.
    Drechsler M; Johst K; Ohl C; Wätzold F
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1475-86. PubMed ID: 18173471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process.
    Reyers B; Roux DJ; Cowling RM; Ginsburg AE; Nel JL; O' Farrell P
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Aug; 24(4):957-65. PubMed ID: 20345401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Devising appropriate policies and instruments in support of private conservation areas: lessons learned from the Klein Karoo, South Africa.
    Pasquini L; Cowling RM; Twyman C; Wainwright J
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):470-8. PubMed ID: 19843125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coupled ecological-social dynamics in a forested landscape: spatial interactions and information flow.
    Satake A; Leslie HM; Iwasa Y; Levin SA
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jun; 246(4):695-707. PubMed ID: 17376488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aggregating high-priority landscape areas to the parcel level: an easement implementation tool.
    Strager MP; Rosenberger RS
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 82(2):290-8. PubMed ID: 16580124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards measuring the transaction costs of co-management in Mkambati Nature Reserve, Eastern Cape, South Africa.
    Blore ML; Cundill G; Mkhulisi M
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():444-55. PubMed ID: 24001677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reorienting systematic conservation assessment for effective conservation planning.
    Sewall BJ; Freestone AL; Moutui MF; Toilibou N; Saïd I; Toumani SM; Attoumane D; Iboura CM
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Aug; 25(4):688-96. PubMed ID: 21771077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency and concordance of alternative methods for minimizing opportunity costs in conservation planning.
    Cameron SE; Williams KJ; Mitchell DK
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):886-96. PubMed ID: 18637906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scale mismatches, conservation planning, and the value of social-network analyses.
    Guerrero AM; McAllister RR; Corcoran J; Wilson KA
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Feb; 27(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 23305381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conservation planning with multiple organizations and objectives.
    Bode M; Probert W; Turner WR; Wilson KA; Venter O
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Apr; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 21129029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conservation businesses and conservation planning in a biological diversity hotspot.
    Di Minin E; Macmillan DC; Goodman PS; Escott B; Slotow R; Moilanen A
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Aug; 27(4):808-20. PubMed ID: 23565917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
    Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Social factors and private benefits influence landholders' riverine restoration priorities in tropical Australia.
    Januchowski-Hartley SR; Moon K; Stoeckl N; Gray S
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 110():20-6. PubMed ID: 22705856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementing ecosystem management in public agencies: lessons from the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service.
    Koontz TM; Bodine J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Feb; 22(1):60-9. PubMed ID: 18254853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing spatially explicit ecological and social values for natural areas to identify effective conservation strategies.
    Bryan BA; Raymond CM; Crossman ND; King D
    Conserv Biol; 2011 Feb; 25(1):172-81. PubMed ID: 20825450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Costs of expanding the network of protected areas as a response to climate change in the Cape Floristic Region.
    Wise RM; Reyers B; Guo C; Midgley GF; De Lange W
    Conserv Biol; 2012 Jun; 26(3):397-407. PubMed ID: 22497474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.