117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20345600)
1. Backward masking during rapid serial visual presentation affects the amplitude but not the latency of the P3 event-related potential.
Brisson B; Robitaille N; Deland-Bélanger A; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V; Jolicoeur P
Psychophysiology; 2010 Sep; 47(5):942-8. PubMed ID: 20345600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. P3 latency shifts in the attentional blink: further evidence for second target processing postponement.
Sessa P; Luria R; Verleger R; Dell'Acqua R
Brain Res; 2007 Mar; 1137(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 17258178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Masking of a first target in the attentional blink attenuates the P3 to the first target and delays the P3 to the second target.
Brisson B; Bourassa MÈ
Psychophysiology; 2014 Jul; 51(7):611-9. PubMed ID: 24635583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can subitizing survive the attentional blink? An ERP study.
Xu X; Liu C
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 440(2):140-4. PubMed ID: 18556118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intramodal and crossmodal processing delays in the attentional blink paradigm revealed by event-related potentials.
Ptito A; Arnell K; Jolicoeur P; Macleod J
Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):794-803. PubMed ID: 18627533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Task switching mediates direct interference of intertarget distractors in the attentional blink: An event-related potential study.
Brisson B
Psychophysiology; 2015 Jul; 52(7):919-32. PubMed ID: 25712465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An electrophysiological investigation of attentional blink in schizophrenia: separating perceptual and attentional processes.
Mathis KI; Wynn JK; Jahshan C; Hellemann G; Darque A; Green MF
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Oct; 86(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 22771850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. To P(E) or not to P(E): a P3-like ERP component reflecting the processing of response errors.
Ridderinkhof KR; Ramautar JR; Wijnen JG
Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):531-8. PubMed ID: 19226310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrophysiological correlates of detecting a visual target and detecting its absence: the role of feature dimensions.
Akyürek EG; Dinkelbach A; Schubö A; Müller HJ
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep; 48(11):3365-70. PubMed ID: 20633570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The attentional blink is immune to masking-induced data limits.
McLaughlin EN; Shore DI; Klein RM
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):169-96. PubMed ID: 11216315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The attentional blink reveals serial working memory encoding: evidence from virtual and human event-related potentials.
Craston P; Wyble B; Chennu S; Bowman H
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 21(3):550-66. PubMed ID: 18564042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regional brain activity associated with visual backward masking.
Green MF; Glahn D; Engel SA; Nuechterlein KH; Sabb F; Strojwas M; Cohen MS
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Jan; 17(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 15701236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cortical dynamics and synchronization related to multiple target consolidation under rapid-serial-visual-presentation conditions.
Kessler K; Gross J; Schmitz F; Schnitzler A
J Physiol Paris; 2006 Jan; 99(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 16026972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stimulus context determines whether non-target stimuli are processed as task-relevant or distractor information.
Sawaki R; Katayama J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 117(11):2532-9. PubMed ID: 17005448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microsaccadic inhibition and P300 enhancement in a visual oddball task.
Valsecchi M; Dimigen O; Kliegl R; Sommer W; Turatto M
Psychophysiology; 2009 May; 46(3):635-44. PubMed ID: 19226309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Object substitution masking interferes with semantic processing: evidence from event-related potentials.
Reiss JE; Hoffman JE
Psychol Sci; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1015-20. PubMed ID: 17201780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Asymmetry of P3 amplitude during oddball tasks reflects the unnaturalness of visual stimuli.
Minami T; Goto K; Kitazaki M; Nakauchi S
Neuroreport; 2009 Oct; 20(16):1471-6. PubMed ID: 19786924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrophysiological evidence for both perceptual and postperceptual selection during the attentional blink.
Giesbrecht B; Sy JL; Elliott JC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):2005-18. PubMed ID: 17892389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of the magnocellular visual pathway in the attentional blink.
Stuart GW; Lambeth SE; Day RH; Gould IC; Castles AE
Brain Cogn; 2012 Mar; 78(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 22218296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The attentional blink impairs detection and delays encoding of visual information: evidence from human electrophysiology.
Dell'Acqua R; Dux PE; Wyble B; Doro M; Sessa P; Meconi F; Jolicœur P
J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 27(4):720-35. PubMed ID: 25390207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
