These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20347254)

  • 1. Determination of reference geometry for polyethylene tibial insert wear analysis.
    Teeter MG; Naudie DD; Milner JS; Holdsworth DW
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr; 26(3):497-503. PubMed ID: 20347254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manufacturing lot affects polyethylene tibial insert volume, thickness, and surface geometry.
    Teeter MG; Milner JS; MacDonald SJ; Naudie DD
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Aug; 227(8):884-9. PubMed ID: 23636769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How do CAD models compare with reverse engineered manufactured components for use in wear analysis?
    Teeter MG; Naudie DD; Bourne RB; Holdsworth DW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Jul; 470(7):1847-54. PubMed ID: 22016002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro quantification of wear in tibial inserts using microcomputed tomography.
    Teeter MG; Naudie DD; McErlain DD; Brandt JM; Yuan X; Macdonald SJ; Holdsworth DW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Jan; 469(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 20676810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polyethylene thickness in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
    Lingaraj K; Morris H; Bartlett J
    Knee; 2011 Jun; 18(3):165-7. PubMed ID: 20537901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metrology to quantify wear and creep of polyethylene tibial knee inserts.
    Muratoglu OK; Perinchief RS; Bragdon CR; O'Connor DO; Konrad R; Harris WH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 May; (410):155-64. PubMed ID: 12771826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ceramic versus cobalt-chrome femoral components; wear of polyethylene insert in total knee prosthesis.
    Oonishi H; Ueno M; Kim SC; Oonishi H; Iwamoto M; Kyomoto M
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Apr; 24(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 18524533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Highly crosslinked polyethylene in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: in vitro performance evaluation of wear, delamination, and tibial post durability.
    Stoller AP; Johnson TS; Popoola OO; Humphrey SM; Blanchard CR
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Apr; 26(3):483-91. PubMed ID: 20413249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surface extraction can provide a reference for micro-CT analysis of retrieved total knee implants.
    Teeter MG; Milner JS; Naudie DD; MacDonald SJ
    Knee; 2014 Aug; 21(4):801-5. PubMed ID: 24853191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurements of surface and subsurface damage in retrieved polyethylene tibial inserts of a contemporary design.
    Teeter MG; Brandt JM; Naudie DD; Bohm ER; McCalden RW; Holdsworth DW
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2012; 22(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 23016787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new method of in vitro wear assessment of the UHMWPE tibial insert in total knee replacement.
    Affatato S; Cristofolini L; Leardini W; Erani P; Zavalloni M; Tigani D; Viceconti M
    Artif Organs; 2008 Dec; 32(12):942-8. PubMed ID: 19133022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simulated normal gait wear testing of a highly cross-linked polyethylene tibial insert.
    Muratoglu OK; Rubash HE; Bragdon CR; Burroughs BR; Huang A; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 2007 Apr; 22(3):435-44. PubMed ID: 17400100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Research progress of polyethylene inserts wear measurement and evaluation in total knee arthroplasty].
    Zhao F; Wang C; Fan Y
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 39(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 26027291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of polyethylene tibial insert damage from in vivo function and in vitro wear simulation.
    Harman MK; DesJardins J; Benson L; Banks SA; LaBerge M; Hodge WA
    J Orthop Res; 2009 Apr; 27(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 18932244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Backside damage corresponding to articular damage in retrieved tibial polyethylene inserts.
    Harman MK; Banks SA; Hodge WA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():137-44. PubMed ID: 17242615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Backside wear of polyethylene tibial inserts: mechanism and magnitude of material loss.
    Conditt MA; Thompson MT; Usrey MM; Ismaily SK; Noble PC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Feb; 87(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 15687155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unicondylar knee retrieval analysis.
    Manson TT; Kelly NH; Lipman JD; Wright TM; Westrich GH
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6 Suppl):108-11. PubMed ID: 20541358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Material and surface factors influencing backside fretting wear in total knee replacement tibial components.
    Billi F; Sangiorgio SN; Aust S; Ebramzadeh E
    J Biomech; 2010 May; 43(7):1310-5. PubMed ID: 20172525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Catastrophic wear of tibial polyethylene inserts.
    Kilgus DJ; Moreland JR; Finerman GA; Funahashi TT; Tipton JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Dec; (273):223-31. PubMed ID: 1959275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship between product demand, tibial polyethylene insert shelf age, and total knee arthroplasty survival: retrospective review of total knees of one design.
    Urban JA; Collier MB; Engh CA; Engh GA
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Apr; 21(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16627139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.