These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20347507)

  • 1. [What to do if the intraocular pressure measurement does not appear reliable].
    Hamard P
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2010 Apr; 33(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 20347507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A; White E; Schlottmann PG; Garway-Heath DF
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
    Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
    Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
    Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
    Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes.
    Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Nessim M; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 92(12):1661-5. PubMed ID: 18757471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An ultra-high-speed Scheimpflug camera for evaluation of corneal deformation response and its impact on IOP measurement.
    Leung CK; Ye C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Apr; 54(4):2885-92. PubMed ID: 23482466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the pressure phosphene tonometer as a self-tonometer.
    Naruse S; Mori K; Kinoshita S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Sep; 25(5):421-8. PubMed ID: 16101948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data.
    Chihara E
    Surv Ophthalmol; 2008; 53(3):203-18. PubMed ID: 18501267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure.
    Broman AT; Congdon NG; Bandeen-Roche K; Quigley HA
    J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 18091174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
    J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
    Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
    Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraocular pressure values obtained by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometry, and goldmann tonometry in keratokonic corneas.
    Bayer A; Sahin A; Hürmeriç V; Ozge G
    J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(8):540-5. PubMed ID: 20164793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Pascal dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Ku JY; Danesh-Meyer HV; Craig JP; Gamble GD; McGhee CN
    Eye (Lond); 2006 Feb; 20(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15803173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.