BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20347796)

  • 1. Radial vs. femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians.
    Koutouzis M; Matejka G; Olivecrona G; Grip L; Albertsson P
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2010; 11(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 20347796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.
    Brueck M; Bandorski D; Kramer W; Wieczorek M; Höltgen R; Tillmanns H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 19926042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transradial versus transfemoral method of percutaneous coronary revascularization for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: comparison of procedural and late-term outcomes.
    Yang YJ; Kandzari DE; Gao Z; Xu B; Chen JL; Qiao SB; Li JJ; Qin XW; Yao M; Wu YJ; Yuan JQ; Chen J; Liu HB; Dai J; Chen T; Wang Y; Li W; Gao RL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 3(10):1035-42. PubMed ID: 20965462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of the transradial and the transfemoral approach in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Rathore S; Hakeem A; Pauriah M; Roberts E; Beaumont A; Morris JL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Jun; 73(7):883-7. PubMed ID: 19455660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
    Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In-hospital outcomes of emergent and elective percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians.
    Merchant FM; Weiner RB; Rao SR; Lawrence R; Healy JL; Pomerantsev E; Rosenfield K; Jang IK
    Coron Artery Dis; 2009 Mar; 20(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 19293712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Dehghani P; Mohammad A; Bajaj R; Hong T; Suen CM; Sharieff W; Chisholm RJ; Kutryk MJ; Fam NP; Cheema AN
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19926044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radial versus femoral access for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention with adjuvant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use.
    Kassam S; Cantor WJ; Patel D; Gilchrist IC; Winegard LD; Rea ME; Bowman KA; Chisholm RJ; Strauss BH
    Can J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 20(14):1439-42. PubMed ID: 15614338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians.
    Jaffe R; Hong T; Sharieff W; Chisholm RJ; Kutryk MJ; Charron T; Cheema AN
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 May; 69(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 17191214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
    Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radial versus femoral access for orally anticoagulated patients.
    Ziakas AG; Koskinas KC; Gavrilidis S; Giannoglou GD; Hadjimiltiades S; Gourassas I; Theofilogiannakos E; Economou F; Styliadis I
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 76(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20882651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety, feasibility and efficacy of transradial primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Valsecchi O; Musumeci G; Vassileva A; Tespili M; Guagliumi G; Gavazzi A; Ferrazzi P
    Ital Heart J; 2003 May; 4(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 12848090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid cycle change to predominantly radial access coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: effect on vascular access site complications.
    Nadarasa K; Robertson MC; Wong CK; Green BK; Chen VH; Wilkins GT; Williams MJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Mar; 79(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 21523899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
    Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies.
    Roule V; Lemaitre A; Sabatier R; Lognoné T; Dahdouh Z; Berger L; Milliez P; Grollier G; Montalescot G; Beygui F
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Nov; 108(11):563-75. PubMed ID: 26365478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral coronary intervention in octogenarians with acute myocardial infarction.
    Lee HW; Cha KS; Ahn J; Choi JC; Oh JH; Choi JH; Lee HC; Yun E; Jang HY; Choi JH; Hong TJ; Jeong MH; Ahn Y; Chae SC; Kim YJ;
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Jan; 202():419-24. PubMed ID: 26433163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transradial vs femoral percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease in octogenarians.
    Bertrand OF; Bagur R; Costerousse O; Rodés-Cabau J
    Indian Heart J; 2010; 62(3):234-7. PubMed ID: 21275300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transradial approach in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with abciximab results in fewer bleeding complications: data from EUROTRANSFER registry.
    Siudak Z; Zawislak B; Dziewierz A; Rakowski T; Jakala J; Bartus S; Noworolnik B; Zasada W; Dubiel JS; Dudek D
    Coron Artery Dis; 2010 Aug; 21(5):292-7. PubMed ID: 20453640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The efficacy and safety of transradial approach in comparison with transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and ad hoc coronary angioplasty in Thailand.
    Sansanayudh N; Champasri K; Piamsomboon C; Sanguanwong S; Narksawasdee C; Tengtrakulcharoen P; Laotavorn P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Nov; 93 Suppl 6():S145-51. PubMed ID: 21280527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced vascular complications and length of stay with transradial rescue angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.
    Cruden NL; Teh CH; Starkey IR; Newby DE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2007 Nov; 70(5):670-5. PubMed ID: 17563094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.