275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20347796)
21. Transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: is transradial coronary intervention suitable for emergency PCI in high-risk acute myocardial infarction?
Iga A; Wagatsuma K; Yamazaki J; Ikeda T
J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 24791717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison between radial and femoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients aged 80 years or older.
Hu F; Yang Y; Qiao S; Xu B; Liu H; Wu Y; Chen J; You S; Chen J; Gao R
J Interv Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 25(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 22575015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Radial versus femoral approach for high-speed rotational atherectomy.
Watt J; Oldroyd KG
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Oct; 74(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 19434605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of 3-year clinical outcomes after transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention.
Natsuaki M; Morimoto T; Furukawa Y; Nakagawa Y; Kadota K; Iwabuchi M; Shizuta S; Shiomi H; Kimura T
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2012 May; 27(2):84-92. PubMed ID: 22623001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Five-year experience with transradial coronary angioplasty in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.
Ruzsa Z; Ungi I; Horváth T; Sepp R; Zimmermann Z; Thury A; Jambrik Z; Sasi V; Tóth G; Forster T; Nemes A
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2009; 10(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 19327668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Transradial vs. Transfemoral Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With or Without High Bleeding Risk Criteria.
Yamamoto K; Natsuaki M; Morimoto T; Shiomi H; Watanabe H; Yamaji K; Watanabe H; Kato T; Saito N; Ando K; Kadota K; Furukawa Y; Kimura T;
Circ J; 2020 Apr; 84(5):723-732. PubMed ID: 32188831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In-hospital outcomes of very elderly patients (85 years and older) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Appleby CE; Ivanov J; Mackie K; Džavík V; Overgaard CB
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Apr; 77(5):634-41. PubMed ID: 21387535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Efficacy of the radial approach for the performance of primary PCI for STEMI.
Cafri C; Zahger D; Merkin M; Weinstein JM; Kobal S; Ilia R
J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 25(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 23468447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transulnar artery approach for percutaneous coronary intervention: an alternative route in a patient with challenging transfemoral access and hypoplastic radial artery.
Chiam PT; Lim VY
Singapore Med J; 2010 May; 51(5):e81-4. PubMed ID: 20593134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The transradial approach is associated with lower risk of adverse outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention: a single-center experience.
Wu C; Liao D; Dyer AM; Chen H; Gilchrist IC
J Invasive Cardiol; 2011 Mar; 23(3):88-92. PubMed ID: 21364235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of procedural times, success rates, and safety between left versus right radial arterial access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.
Larsen P; Shah S; Waxman S; Freilich M; Riskalla N; Piemonte T; Jeon C; Pyne C
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Jul; 78(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20939041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bleeding complications in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in a radial center.
Barthélémy O; Silvain J; Brieger D; Mercadier A; Lancar R; Bellemain-Appaix A; Beygui F; Collet JP; Costagliola D; Montalescot G
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 22162411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Transradial approach versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and coronary angioplasty.
Mullin MK
Crit Care Nurs Q; 2014; 37(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 24595253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions and comparison with transfemoral route.
Rathore S; Roberts E; Hakeem AR; Pauriah M; Beaumont A; Morris JL
J Interv Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 22(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 19689657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Transradial versus transfemoral artery approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in the extremely obese.
Hibbert B; Simard T; Wilson KR; Hawken S; Wells GA; Ramirez FD; Le May MR; So DY; Glover CA; Froeschl M; Marquis JF; Labinaz M; Dick A; O'Brien ER
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Aug; 5(8):819-26. PubMed ID: 22917453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Multicentric experience with the use of Sheathless 6.5 French-size catheter in coronary angioplasty for bifurcation lesions: feasibility and safety].
Cheaito R; Benamer H; Tritar A; Mustafic H; Derraz Y; Tavolaro O; Hovasse T; Gaultier C; Garot P; Lefevre T; Louvard Y; Morice MC
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2012 Dec; 61(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 23092523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical outcomes following radial versus femoral artery access in primary or rescue percutaneous coronary intervention in Scotland: retrospective cohort study of 4534 patients.
Johnman C; Pell JP; Mackay DF; Behan M; Slack R; Oldroyd KG; Berry C
Heart; 2012 Apr; 98(7):552-7. PubMed ID: 22337951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Feasibility and safety of 7-Fr radial approach for complex PCI.
Egred M
J Interv Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 24(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 21585545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcomes of Transradial PCI compared to Transfemoral PCI in veterans with anemia: Insight from the VA Clinical Assessment, Reporting and Tracking (CART) program.
Bagai J; Hess E; Penny WF; Plomondon ME; Waldo SW
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Nov; 20(11):990-996. PubMed ID: 30679117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of transradial vs. transfemoral approach in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction with primary angioplasty and abciximab.
Philippe F; Larrazet F; Meziane T; Dibie A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2004 Jan; 61(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 14696162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
