These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20348164)

  • 1. Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance.
    Atalay Z; Tortop T
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):655-61. PubMed ID: 20348164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facemask therapy with and without expansion.
    Tortop T; Keykubat A; Yuksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):467-74. PubMed ID: 17920499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.
    Westwood PV; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Sarver DM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):306-20. PubMed ID: 12637903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Treatment and posttreatment effects of mandibular cervical headgear followed by fixed appliances in Class III malocclusion.
    Rey D; Angel D; Oberti G; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):371-8; quiz 476.e1. PubMed ID: 18331935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of modified and conventional facemask therapies with expansion on dynamic measurement of natural head position in Class III patients.
    Yagci A; Uysal T; Usumez S; Orhan M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e223-31. PubMed ID: 22051500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):404-13. PubMed ID: 11029736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the modified maxillary protractor applied to Class III malocclusion with retruded maxilla in early mixed dentition.
    Kajiyama K; Murakami T; Suzuki A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):549-59. PubMed ID: 11094369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction of post-treatment outcome after combined treatment with maxillary protraction and chincap appliances.
    Yoshida I; Yamaguchi N; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 16113036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of cervical headgear with an expanded inner bow in the permanent dentition.
    Varlik SK; Iscan HN
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 18678761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of treatment with a combined maxillary protraction and chincap appliance in skeletal Class III patients with different vertical skeletal morphologies.
    Yoshida I; Shoji T; Mizoguchi I
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):126-33. PubMed ID: 17218717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
    Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment with facemask and removable upper appliance versus modified tandem traction bow appliance: the effects on mandibular space.
    Tortop T; Kaygisiz E; Erkun S; Yuksel S
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 29059295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
    Tortop T; Kaygisiz E; Gencer D; Yuksel S; Atalay Z
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):642-8. PubMed ID: 24274958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activator-headgear treatment.
    Lerstøl M; Torget O; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 19477971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of protraction headgear on Class III malocclusion.
    Ngan P; Wei SH; Hagg U; Yiu CK; Merwin D; Stickel B
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Mar; 23(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 1641462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of maxillary protraction with or without expansion on the sagittal pharyngeal dimensions in Class III subjects.
    Mucedero M; Baccetti T; Franchi L; Cozza P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):777-81. PubMed ID: 19524838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An orthodontic/orthopedic correction of the Class III malocclusion in young patients with a modified RPE appliance and a facemask.
    Park JH; Cruz C; Alexander RG
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(3):23-6. PubMed ID: 21032992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.