These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20348563)

  • 1. The unilateral field advantage in repetition detection: effects of perceptual grouping and task demands.
    Hayes MT; Swallow KM; Jiang YV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):583-90. PubMed ID: 20348563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Familiarity does not affect the unilateral field advantage for repetition detection.
    Butcher SJ; Cavanagh P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1216-25. PubMed ID: 22532384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Processing multidimensional objects under different perceptual loads: the priority of bottom-up perceptual saliency.
    Wei P; Zhou X
    Brain Res; 2006 Oct; 1114(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 16935270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast perceptual priming in the left and right hemispheres.
    Korsnes MS; Magnussen S
    Scand J Psychol; 2006 Apr; 47(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 16542350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Divergence of categorical and coordinate spatial processing assessed with ERPs.
    van der Lubbe RH; Schölvinck ML; Kenemans JL; Postma A
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(9):1547-59. PubMed ID: 16513145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatial repetition blindness is modulated by selective attention to color or shape.
    Kanwisher N; Driver J; Machado L
    Cogn Psychol; 1995 Dec; 29(3):303-37. PubMed ID: 8556848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contour-integration deficits on the intact side of the visual field in hemianopia patients.
    Paramei GV; Sabel BA
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 188(1):109-24. PubMed ID: 18077009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Crossing the midline: reducing attentional deficits via interhemispheric interactions.
    Brooks JL; Wong Y; Robertson LC
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(4):572-82. PubMed ID: 15716147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dopamine, paranormal belief, and the detection of meaningful stimuli.
    Krummenacher P; Mohr C; Haker H; Brugger P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1670-81. PubMed ID: 19642883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is interhemispheric communication disturbed when the two hemispheres perform on separate tasks?
    Bergert S; Windmann S; Güntürkün O
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(8):1457-67. PubMed ID: 16378627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extinction: a window into attentional competition.
    Riddoch MJ; Rappaport SJ; Humphreys GW
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():149-59. PubMed ID: 19733755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. From reorienting of attention to biased competition: evidence from hemifield effects.
    Mathôt S; Hickey C; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):651-7. PubMed ID: 20348571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repetition suppression in occipital-temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects.
    Chouinard PA; Morrissey BF; Köhler S; Goodale MA
    Neuroimage; 2008 May; 41(1):130-44. PubMed ID: 18375148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring interhemispheric collaboration in older compared to younger adults.
    Cherry BJ; Yamashiro M; Anderson E; Barrett C; Adamson MM; Hellige JB
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Mar; 72(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 19828224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual letter matching: hemispheric functioning or scanning biases?
    Fecteau JH; Enns JT
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(10):1412-28. PubMed ID: 15989933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implicit identification of irrelevant local objects interacts with global/local processing of hierarchical stimuli.
    Poirel N; Pineau A; Mellet E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):321-36. PubMed ID: 16574048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Picture naming in young children: a developmental study on interhemispheric collaboration.
    Liégeois F; de Schonen S
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):123-37. PubMed ID: 12027398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audiovisual integration in patients with visual deficit.
    Frassinetti F; Bolognini N; Bottari D; Bonora A; Làdavas E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1442-52. PubMed ID: 16197697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Associative grouping: perceptual grouping of shapes by association.
    Vickery TJ; Jiang YV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):896-909. PubMed ID: 19429967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.