These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20348572)

  • 1. Nonspatial interdimensional attentional capture.
    Inukai T; Kawahara J; Kumada T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):658-66. PubMed ID: 20348572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode.
    Lamy D; Leber A; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1019-31. PubMed ID: 15584812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characteristics of covert and overt visual orienting: Evidence from attentional and oculomotor capture.
    Wu SC; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1050-67. PubMed ID: 14585022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
    Al-Aidroos N; Harrison S; Pratt J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?
    Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional effects of negative faces: top-down contingent or involuntary?
    Horstmann G; Becker SI
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1416-34. PubMed ID: 19064487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C; Janczyk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.
    Inukai T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 20436191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: An empirical comparison of display-size and distance methods.
    Turatto M; Galfano G; Gardini S; Mascetti GG
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Feb; 57(2):297-324. PubMed ID: 14742178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs?
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):764-87. PubMed ID: 17683227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
    Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention.
    Folk CL; Remington RW; Wu SC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: additivity is no evidence for filtering.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):672-82. PubMed ID: 20348574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus-driven attentional capture by a static discontinuity between perceptual groups.
    Burnham BR; Neely JH; Naginsky Y; Thomas M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):317-29. PubMed ID: 20364921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.
    Müller HJ; Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19170466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional capture by the onset and offset of motion signals outside the spatial focus of attention.
    Kawahara J; Yanase K; Kitazaki M
    J Vis; 2012 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 23161003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.