These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20348572)

  • 41. Multisensory top-down sets: Evidence for contingent crossmodal capture.
    Mast F; Frings C; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Aug; 77(6):1970-85. PubMed ID: 25944449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.
    Lamy D; Yashar A
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: visual working memory content affects visual attention.
    Olivers CN; Meijer F; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1243-65. PubMed ID: 17002535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The roles of distractor noise and target certainty in search: a signal detection model.
    Santhi N; Reeves A
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1235-56. PubMed ID: 15066389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks.
    Rodríguez Holguín S; Doallo S; Vizoso C; Cadaveira F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Optimal observer model of single-fixation oddity search predicts a shallow set-size function.
    Schoonveld W; Shimozaki SS; Eckstein MP
    J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):1.1-16. PubMed ID: 17997670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. No capture outside the attentional window.
    Belopolsky AV; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2010 Nov; 50(23):2543-50. PubMed ID: 20807547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Searching from the top down: ageing and attentional guidance during singleton detection.
    Whiting WL; Madden DJ; Pierce TW; Allen PA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Jan; 58(1):72-97. PubMed ID: 15881292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Identifying a "default" visual search mode with operant conditioning.
    Kawahara J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Sep; 135(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 20635466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Oculomotor capture during real-world scene viewing depends on cognitive load.
    Matsukura M; Brockmole JR; Boot WR; Henderson JM
    Vision Res; 2011 Mar; 51(6):546-52. PubMed ID: 21310171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. It's under control: top-down search strategies can override attentional capture.
    Leber AB; Egeth HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):132-8. PubMed ID: 16724780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Interactions between top-down and bottom-up attention in barn owls (Tyto alba).
    Lev-Ari T; Gutfreund Y
    Anim Cogn; 2018 Mar; 21(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 29214438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture.
    Burnham BR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Jun; 14(3):392-422. PubMed ID: 17874581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli.
    Le Pelley ME; Seabrooke T; Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1628-1642. PubMed ID: 28584955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Top-Down Prioritization of Salient Items May Produce the So-Called Stimulus-Driven Capture.
    Benoni H
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():218. PubMed ID: 29599731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.
    Folk CL; Leber AB; Egeth HE
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Jul; 64(5):741-53. PubMed ID: 12201333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Investigating attentional control sets: Evidence for the compilation of multi-feature control sets.
    Merz S; Beege F; Schöpper LM; Spence C; Frings C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):596-612. PubMed ID: 36229630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Stimuli that signal the availability of reward break into attentional focus.
    Wang L; Li S; Zhou X; Theeuwes J
    Vision Res; 2018 Mar; 144():20-28. PubMed ID: 29408161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Search mode, not the attentional window, determines the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Feb; 86(2):457-470. PubMed ID: 36207666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Contingent attentional capture by conceptually relevant images.
    Wyble B; Folk C; Potter MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):861-71. PubMed ID: 23163786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.