156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20348580)
1. Effects of sign language experience on categorical perception of dynamic ASL pseudosigns.
Best CT; Mathur G; Miranda KA; Lillo-Martin D
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):747-62. PubMed ID: 20348580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual field asymmetries for motion processing in deaf and hearing signers.
Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):170-81. PubMed ID: 12027401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of spatial attention on motion processing in deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing nonsigners.
Bosworth RG; Dobkins KR
Brain Cogn; 2002 Jun; 49(1):152-69. PubMed ID: 12027400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.
Cattani A; Clibbens J; Perfect TJ
Neuropsychology; 2007 Jan; 21(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 17201534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Categorical perception of face actions: their role in sign language and in communicative facial displays.
Campbell R; Woll B; Benson PJ; Wallace SB
Q J Exp Psychol A; 1999 Feb; 52(1):67-95. PubMed ID: 10101974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing action gestures and classifier verbs of motion: evidence from Australian Sign Language, Taiwan Sign Language, and nonsigners' gestures without speech.
Schembri A; Jones C; Burnham D
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(3):272-90. PubMed ID: 15858072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neural systems mediating American sign language: effects of sensory experience and age of acquisition.
Neville HJ; Coffey SA; Lawson DS; Fischer A; Emmorey K; Bellugi U
Brain Lang; 1997 May; 57(3):285-308. PubMed ID: 9126418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neural responses to meaningless pseudosigns: evidence for sign-based phonetic processing in superior temporal cortex.
Emmorey K; Xu J; Braun A
Brain Lang; 2011 Apr; 117(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 21094525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of language experience on the perception of American Sign Language.
Morford JP; Grieve-Smith AB; MacFarlane J; Staley J; Waters G
Cognition; 2008 Oct; 109(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 18834975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Signed language working memory capacity of signed language interpreters and deaf signers.
Wang J; Napier J
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2013 Apr; 18(2):271-86. PubMed ID: 23303377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The sign superiority effect: Lexical status facilitates peripheral handshape identification for deaf signers.
Schotter ER; Johnson E; Lieberman AM
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1397-1410. PubMed ID: 32940493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-verbal IQ is correlated with visual field advantages for short duration coherent motion detection in deaf signers with varied ASL exposure and etiologies of deafness.
Samar VJ; Parasnis I
Brain Cogn; 2007 Dec; 65(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 17574715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The perception of handshapes in American sign language.
Baker SA; Idsardi WJ; Golinkoff RM; Petitto LA
Mem Cognit; 2005 Jul; 33(5):887-904. PubMed ID: 16383176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced facial discrimination: effects of experience with American sign language.
Bettger J; Emmorey K; McCullough S; Bellugi U
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 1997; 2(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 15579850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lexical recognition in sign language: effects of phonetic structure and morphology.
Emmorey K; Corina D
Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Dec; 71(3 Pt 2):1227-52. PubMed ID: 2087376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dissociating linguistic and nonlinguistic gestural communication in the brain.
MacSweeney M; Campbell R; Woll B; Giampietro V; David AS; McGuire PK; Calvert GA; Brammer MJ
Neuroimage; 2004 Aug; 22(4):1605-18. PubMed ID: 15275917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. American Sign Language Comprehension Test: A Tool for Sign Language Researchers.
Hauser PC; Paludneviciene R; Riddle W; Kurz KB; Emmorey K; Contreras J
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2016 Jan; 21(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 26590608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of Gesture and Linguistic Experience on Sign Perception.
Gimeno-Martínez M; Costa A; Baus C
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2020 Jan; 25(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 31504619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preexisting semantic representation improves working memory performance in the visuospatial domain.
Rudner M; Orfanidou E; Cardin V; Capek CM; Woll B; Rönnberg J
Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 26800983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Aphasic and parkinsonian signing: differences in phonological disruption.
Brentari D; Poizner H; Kegl J
Brain Lang; 1995 Jan; 48(1):69-105. PubMed ID: 7712149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
