607 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20350249)
1. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy.
Yoshioka H; Stevens K; Hargreaves BA; Steines D; Genovese M; Dillingham MF; Winalski CS; Lang P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 20(5):857-64. PubMed ID: 15503323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Kelman CG; Fuchs MD; Ratner LM; Wirth CR; Hospodar PP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8659356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities.
Recht MP; Piraino DW; Paletta GA; Schils JP; Belhobek GH
Radiology; 1996 Jan; 198(1):209-12. PubMed ID: 8539380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. IDEAL 3D spoiled gradient echo of the articular cartilage of the knee on 3.0 T MRI: a comparison with conventional 3.0 T fast spin-echo T2 fat saturation image.
Han CH; Park HJ; Lee SY; Chung EC; Choi SH; Yun JS; Rho MH
Acta Radiol; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1479-86. PubMed ID: 25348476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MRI findings in injured articular cartilage of the knee correlated with surgical findings.
Li XM; Peng WJ; Wu H; Kacher D; Xia LM; Ai F; Li F; Xiong W
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(21):2624-30. PubMed ID: 19951582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.
Li X; Yu C; Wu H; Daniel K; Hu D; Xia L; Pan C; Xu A; Hu J; Wang L; Peng W; Li F
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression.
Sonin AH; Pensy RA; Mulligan ME; Hatem S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1159-66. PubMed ID: 12388492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR arthrography of the hip: diagnostic performance of a dedicated water-excitation 3D double-echo steady-state sequence to detect cartilage lesions.
Knuesel PR; Pfirrmann CW; Noetzli HP; Dora C; Zanetti M; Hodler J; Kuehn B; Schmid MR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1729-35. PubMed ID: 15547220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction steady-state free precession imaging.
Kijowski R; Lu A; Block W; Grist T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):168-75. PubMed ID: 16758476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical usefulness of adding 3D cartilage imaging sequences to a routine knee MR protocol.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods M; Del Rio AM; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):159-67. PubMed ID: 21178062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging.
Disler DG; Peters TL; Muscoreil SJ; Ratner LM; Wagle WA; Cousins JP; Rifkin MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):887-92. PubMed ID: 8092029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3.0-T evaluation of knee cartilage by using three-dimensional IDEAL GRASS imaging: comparison with fast spin-echo imaging.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods MA; Shinki K; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 20173102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Articular cartilage grading of the knee: diagnostic performance of fat-suppressed 3D volume isotropic turbo spin-echo acquisition (VISTA) compared with 3D T1 high-resolution isovolumetric examination (THRIVE).
Lee YH; Hahn S; Lim D; Suh JS
Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):190-196. PubMed ID: 27207633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of sagittal fat-suppressed proton-density fast-spin-echo of the knee joint as a limited protocol in evaluating internal knee derangements.
Khoury NJ; Mahfoud Z; Masrouha KZ; Elkattah R; Assaad T; Abdallah A; Hourani MH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(5):653-61. PubMed ID: 21926865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of cartilage surface injuries using 3D-double echo steady state (3D-DESS): effect of changing flip angle from 40° to 90°.
Moriya S; Miki Y; Kanagaki M; Yamamoto A; Okudaira S; Nakamura S; Yokobayashi T; Ishikawa M
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1138-42. PubMed ID: 22042983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of IDEAL 2D FSE and 3D SPGR with fat-saturated 2D FSE and 3D SPGR in a porcine model.
Cha JG; Yoo JH; Rhee SJ; Hwang SS; Han JK
Acta Radiol; 2014 May; 55(4):462-9. PubMed ID: 23943628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
