These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2035049)

  • 1. Communicating probabilistic information to cancer patients: is there 'noise' on the line?
    Sutherland HJ; Lockwood GA; Tritchler DL; Sem F; Brooks L; Till JE
    Soc Sci Med; 1991; 32(6):725-31. PubMed ID: 2035049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How age, outcome severity, and scale influence general medicine clinic patients' interpretations of verbal probability terms.
    Mazur DJ; Merz JF
    J Gen Intern Med; 1994 May; 9(5):268-71. PubMed ID: 8046529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patients' interpretations of probability terms.
    Mazur DJ; Hickam DH
    J Gen Intern Med; 1991; 6(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 2066829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients' interpretations of verbal expressions of probability: implications for securing informed consent to medical interventions.
    Mazur DJ; Merz JF
    Behav Sci Law; 1994; 12(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 10150709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probability information in risk communication: a review of the research literature.
    Visschers VH; Meertens RM; Passchier WW; de Vries NN
    Risk Anal; 2009 Feb; 29(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 19000070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Communicating tailored risk information of cancer treatment side effects: Only words or also numbers?
    Vromans RD; Pauws SC; Bol N; van de Poll-Franse LV; Krahmer EJ
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Oct; 20(1):277. PubMed ID: 33109175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How should risk be communicated to children: a cross-sectional study comparing different formats of probability information.
    Ulph F; Townsend E; Glazebrook C
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2009 Jun; 9():26. PubMed ID: 19500337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hope and probability: patient perspectives of the meaning of numerical information in cancer communication.
    Thorne S; Hislop TG; Kuo M; Armstrong EA
    Qual Health Res; 2006 Mar; 16(3):318-36. PubMed ID: 16449684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health Professionals Prefer to Communicate Risk-Related Numerical Information Using "1-in-X" Ratios.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Petrova D; Garcia-Retamero R; Walasek L; Bhatia S
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Apr; 38(3):366-376. PubMed ID: 29068246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imprecision and Preferences in Interpretation of Verbal Probabilities in Health: a Systematic Review.
    Andreadis K; Chan E; Park M; Benda NC; Sharma MM; Demetres M; Delgado D; Sigworth E; Chen Q; Liu A; Grossman Liu L; Sharko M; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Ancker JS
    J Gen Intern Med; 2021 Dec; 36(12):3820-3829. PubMed ID: 34357577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Verbal Descriptions of the Probability of Treatment Complications Lead to High Variability in Risk Perceptions: A Survey Study.
    Rosen JE; Agrawal N; Flum DR; Liao JM
    Ann Surg; 2023 Apr; 277(4):e766-e771. PubMed ID: 35129504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verbal expressions of probability in informed consent litigation.
    Merz JF; Druzdzel MJ; Mazur DJ
    Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 1766330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interpretation of and preference for probability expressions among Japanese patients and physicians.
    Ohnishi M; Fukui T; Matsui K; Hira K; Shinozuka M; Ezaki H; Otaki J; Kurokawa W; Imura H; Koyama H; Shimbo T
    Fam Pract; 2002 Feb; 19(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 11818343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
    Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How informed is consent? Understanding of pictorial and verbal probability information by medical inpatients.
    Fuller R; Dudley N; Blacktop J
    Postgrad Med J; 2002 Sep; 78(923):543-4. PubMed ID: 12357016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Verbal probabilities: Very likely to be somewhat more confusing than numbers.
    Wintle BC; Fraser H; Wills BC; Nicholson AE; Fidler F
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0213522. PubMed ID: 30995242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency or probability? A qualitative study of risk communication formats used in health care.
    Schapira MM; Nattinger AB; McHorney CA
    Med Decis Making; 2001; 21(6):459-67. PubMed ID: 11760103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Communicating uncertainty in national security intelligence: Expert and nonexpert interpretations of and preferences for verbal and numeric formats.
    Irwin D; Mandel DR
    Risk Anal; 2023 May; 43(5):943-957. PubMed ID: 35994518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communicating probability in clinical reports: nurses' numerical associations to verbal expressions.
    Damrosch SP; Soeken K
    Res Nurs Health; 1983 Jun; 6(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 6553947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of institutional review board professionals' and patients' views on consent for research on medical practices.
    Kraft SA; Cho MK; Constantine M; Lee SS; Kelley M; Korngiebel D; James C; Kuwana E; Meyer A; Porter K; Diekema D; Capron AM; Alicic R; Wilfond BS; Magnus D
    Clin Trials; 2016 Oct; 13(5):555-65. PubMed ID: 27257125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.