49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20350681)
1. Malignant lesions initially categorized as probably benign breast lesions: retrospective review of ultrasonographic, clinical and pathologic characteristics.
Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kwak JY; Yoon JH; Kim SJ; Sohn YM; Kim EK
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):551-9. PubMed ID: 20350681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred?
Park YM; Kim EK; Lee JH; Ryu JH; Han SS; Choi SJ; Lee SJ; Yoon HK
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1104-11. PubMed ID: 18855166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Targeted ultrasound of the breast in women with abnormal MRI findings for whom biopsy has been recommended.
Meissnitzer M; Dershaw DD; Lee CH; Morris EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1025-9. PubMed ID: 19770325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Probably benign breast lesions on ultrasonography: a retrospective review of ultrasonographic features and clinical factors affecting the BI-RADS categorization.
Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Kwak JY; Kim EK
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 20350247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Papillary lesions of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle].
Bazzocchi M; Berra I; Francescutti GE; Del Frate C; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C
Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 11479438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions].
Fan ZQ; Ouyang T; Wang TF; Li JF; Xie YT; Fan T; Zhang Z; Lin BY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 45(17):1185-7. PubMed ID: 18067713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency of malignancy in lesions classified as probably benign after dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI examination.
Sadowski EA; Kelcz F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 21(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 15834907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical indication and patient age predict likelihood of malignancy in suspicious breast MRI lesions.
Gutierrez RL; Demartini WB; Eby P; Kurland BF; Peacock S; Lehman CD
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1281-5. PubMed ID: 19733804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of referring physician specialty and practice type on referral for image-guided breast biopsy.
Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Gareen IF
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):488-93. PubMed ID: 17411865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Gail model predicts breast cancer in women with suspicious radiographic lesions.
Weik JL; Lum SS; Esquivel PA; Tully RJ; Bae WC; Petersen FF; Jaque JM; Reeves ME; Garberoglio CA
Am J Surg; 2005 Oct; 190(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 16164914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rate of malignancy in MRI-detected probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions.
Spick C; Szolar DH; Baltzer PA; Tillich M; Reittner P; Preidler KW; Pinker-Domenig K; Helbich TH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 24555608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions: value of US in management--follow-up and outcome.
Raza S; Chikarmane SA; Neilsen SS; Zorn LM; Birdwell RL
Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):773-81. PubMed ID: 18647850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered probably benign or low suspicion: implications for management.
Giess CS; Smeglin LZ; Meyer JE; Ritner JA; Birdwell RL
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1943-9. PubMed ID: 23197547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Probably benign lesions at breast magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience in high-risk women.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Benton CL; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD
Cancer; 2003 Jul; 98(2):377-88. PubMed ID: 12872360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening-detected and symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the sonographic and pathologic features.
Shin HJ; Kim HH; Kim SM; Kwon GY; Gong G; Cho OK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):516-25. PubMed ID: 18212241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of rate of development and rate of change for benign and malignant breast calcifications at the lumpectomy bed.
Giess CS; Keating DM; Osborne MP; Mester J; Rosenblatt R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Sep; 175(3):789-93. PubMed ID: 10954468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
