169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20350684)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging vs. transvaginal ultrasound for cervical length assessment in the second half of pregnancy.
Brandão RS; Pires CR; de Souza E; Avanza LL; Mattar R; Araujo Júnior E; Nardozza LM; Moron AF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Apr; 36(4):571-5. PubMed ID: 20350684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of transvaginal cervical length measurements and quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization of the cervix in the second and third trimester of pregnancy.
Stein W; Hellmeyer L; Schmidt S; Tekesin I
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Dec; 32 Suppl 2():E169-74. PubMed ID: 21630183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of ultrasound measurements of cervical length and width in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
Valentin L; Bergelin I
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 20(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 12230448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sonographic cervical length measurement in pregnant women with a cervical pessary.
Goya M; Pratcorona L; Higueras T; Perez-Hoyos S; Carreras E; Cabero L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 38(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 21305638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of cervical elastography: a reproducibility study.
Molina FS; Gómez LF; Florido J; Padilla MC; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 39(6):685-9. PubMed ID: 22173854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transperineal versus transvaginal ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervix at each trimester in normal pregnant women.
Ozdemir I; Demirci F; Yucel O
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 15904442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transabdominal scanning of the cervix at the 20-week morphology scan: comparison with transvaginal cervical measurements in a healthy nulliparous population.
Stone PR; Chan EH; McCowan LM; Taylor RS; Mitchell JM;
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Dec; 50(6):523-7. PubMed ID: 21133862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reference data representative of normal findings at two-dimensional and three-dimensional gray-scale ultrasound examination of the cervix from 17 to 41 weeks' gestation.
Rovas L; Sladkevicius P; Strobel E; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 16388513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation.
Kurtzman JT; Goldsmith LJ; Gall SA; Spinnato JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Oct; 179(4):852-7. PubMed ID: 9790358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography.
Cicero S; Skentou C; Souka A; To MS; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Apr; 17(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 11339192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic measurements of cervical length in pregnant women between 16 and 24 weeks of gestation.
Songserm V; Komwilaisak R; Saksiriwuttho P; Kongwattanakul K
J Clin Ultrasound; 2019 Sep; 47(7):389-393. PubMed ID: 31245845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 32(5):657-62. PubMed ID: 18816491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of transperineal and transvaginal sonography in predicting preterm delivery.
Yazici G; Yildiz A; Tiras MB; Arslan M; Kanik A; Oz U
J Clin Ultrasound; 2004 Jun; 32(5):225-30. PubMed ID: 15124188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transvaginal grey scale histogram of the cervix at 20-25 weeks of pregnancy.
Furtado MR; Pires CR; Araujo Júnior E; De Souza E; Nardozza LM; Moron AF
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Oct; 50(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 21039378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Second trimester cervical length measurements with transvaginal ultrasound: A prospective observational agreement and reliability study.
Kuusela P; Wennerholm UB; Fadl H; Wesström J; Lindgren P; Hagberg H; Jacobsson B; Valentin L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Nov; 99(11):1476-1485. PubMed ID: 32392356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between trans-vaginal and trans-abdominal ultrasound examination of the cervix in the second trimester of pregnancy: a prospective study.
Calandra D; Mercaldi M; De Vito M; Buca D; Liberati M; Lucidi A; Rizzo G; D'Antonio F
J Perinat Med; 2024 Jan; 52(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 37942777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer.
Pálsdóttir K; Fridsten S; Blomqvist L; Alagic Z; Fischerova D; Gaurilcikas A; Hasselrot K; Jäderling F; Testa AC; Sundin A; Epstein E
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 58(5):773-779. PubMed ID: 33915001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reference ranges for cervical length by transvaginal scan in singleton pregnancies.
Silva SV; Damião R; Fonseca EB; Garcia S; Lippi UG
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 May; 23(5):379-82. PubMed ID: 19895354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical changes in twin pregnancies observed by transvaginal ultrasound during the latter half of pregnancy: a longitudinal, observational study.
Bergelin I; Valentin L
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 21(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 12808672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasonography for cervical length measurement: agreement between transvaginal and translabial techniques.
Carr DB; Smith K; Parsons L; Chansky K; Shields LE
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 96(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 11004358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
