259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2035145)
21. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
Khan EA; Tyndall DA; Caplan D
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The influence of radiographic exposure factors on the diagnosis of occlusal caries.
Skodje F; Espelid I; Kvile K; Tveit AB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 9656870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Intraoral storage phosphor radiography for approximal caries detection and effect of image magnification: comparison with conventional radiography.
Svanaes DB; Møystad A; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Jul; 82(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 8843461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiography for the diagnosis of dental caries in posterior teeth.
Shearer AC; Wilson NH
Clin Prev Dent; 1989; 11(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 2598573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection.
Abreu M; Mol A; Ludlow JB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 11250640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. X-rays and the green factor: balancing efficacy and risk.
Monteith B
N Z Dent J; 1999 Mar; 95(419):21-2. PubMed ID: 10208081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
Møystad A; Svanaes DB; van der Stelt PF; Gröndahl HG; Wenzel A; van Ginkel FC; Kullendorff B; Hintze H; Larheim TA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Receiver operating characteristics of RadioVisioGraphy.
Dagenais ME; Clark BG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Feb; 79(2):238-45. PubMed ID: 7614189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.
Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Depth of occlusal caries assessed clinically, by conventional film radiographs, and by digitized, processed radiographs.
Wenzel A; Fejerskov O; Kidd E; Joyston-Bechal S; Groeneveld A
Caries Res; 1990; 24(5):327-33. PubMed ID: 2261604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative diagnostic performance of TACT slices and its multiple source images: an in vitro study.
Abreu M; Yi-Ching L; Abreu AL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 15314000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of the number of basis images and projection array on caries detection using tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu M; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Nortjé CJ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 11803385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Risk factors for a false positive test outcome in diagnosis of caries in approximal surfaces: impact of radiographic modality and observer characteristics.
Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Gotfredsen E
Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 17426395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The efficacy of caries detection using three intraoral films under different processing conditions.
Ludlow JB; Platin E; Delano EO; Clifton L
J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 128(10):1401-8. PubMed ID: 9332141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis.
Wenzel A; Hintze H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 10740474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. RVG-S, VIXA, and Ektaspeed film in detection of proximal enamel defects under orthodontic bands.
Reichl P; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 8678348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Study of caries using axial-mesial-distal sections and interproximal and periapical radiographs with paralleling and bisecting technics].
Ferreira ET; Matson E; de Oliveira JX; de Freitas A
Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(3):223-7. PubMed ID: 2135428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical and laboratory radiographic caries diagnosis. A study of the same teeth.
Hintze H; Wenze A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Jun; 25(3):115-8. PubMed ID: 9084258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Detection of proximal caries in vitro using standard and task-specific enhanced images from a storage phosphor plate system.
Li G; Sanderink GC; Berkhout WE; Syriopoulos K; van der Stelt PF
Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):231-4. PubMed ID: 17426405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The efficiency of three different films and radiovisiography in detecting approximal carious lesions.
Erten H; Akarslan ZZ; Topuz O
Quintessence Int; 2005 Jan; 36(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 15709499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
