These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2035145)

  • 41. The effect of a knowledge-based, image analysis and clinical decision support system on observer performance in the diagnosis of approximal caries from radiographic images.
    Firestone AR; Sema D; Heaven TJ; Weems RA
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 9544861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Radiographic study of the area-volume relationship in interproximal cavities.
    Lobene RR; Zulqar-Nain BJ
    J Dent Res; 1966; 45(3):939-44. PubMed ID: 5222497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of image magnification of digitized bitewing radiographs on approximal caries detection: an in vitro study.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 9161171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of film fog on radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Svenson B; Gröndahl HG; Lindvall AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Aug; 19(3):105-8. PubMed ID: 2088781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Seven ways to achieve quality full-mouth surveys.
    Gomolka KA
    CDS Rev; 2000 Apr; 93(3):34-5. PubMed ID: 11276523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Does the addition of a lead foil to digital radiographic receptors influence image contrast and approximal caries lesions diagnosis?
    Fontenele RC; Nejaim Y; Farias Gomes A; Gaêta-Araujo H; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 May; 49(4):20190384. PubMed ID: 32027521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Extraoral radiographic imaging of primary caries.
    Clifton TL; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jul; 27(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 9780894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessment of a new processor containing a self-cleaning synthetic-web transport mechanism.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 8508937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A sensitometric comparison of four dental X-ray films and their diagnostic accuracy.
    Svenson B; Welander U; Shi XQ; Stamatakis H; Tronje G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9442614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of proximal caries depth measurements: comparison between limited cone beam computed tomography, storage phosphor and film radiography.
    Akdeniz BG; Gröndahl HG; Magnusson B
    Caries Res; 2006; 40(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 16707867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Radiographic diagnosis of dental caries.
    Dove SB
    J Dent Educ; 2001 Oct; 65(10):985-90. PubMed ID: 11700001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of different developing solutions and developing times on radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Svenson B; Petersson A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1990 Nov; 19(4):157-60. PubMed ID: 2097224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Digitisation and display of intra-oral films.
    Attaelmanan A; Borg E; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 10808223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A clinical comparison of xeroradiography and film radiography for the detection of proximal caries.
    White SC; Gratt BM; Bauer JG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Feb; 65(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 3422729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films.
    White SC; Yoon DC
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Jun; 21(6):530-2, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 11199671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Using computers to diagnose and plan treatment of approximal caries. Detected in radiographs.
    Duncan RC; Heaven T; Weems RA; Firestone AR; Greer DF; Patel JR
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Jul; 126(7):873-82. PubMed ID: 7629363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of filtration, collimation, and target-receptor distance on artificial approximal enamel lesion detection with the use of RadioVisioGraphy.
    Parks ET; Miles DA; Van Dis ML; Williamson GF; Razmus TF; Bricker SL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 8015809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Radiation dosage of a dental imaging system.
    Soh G; Loh FC; Chong YH
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Mar; 24(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 8511278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [A comparative study of open-ended and pointed cone radiographs].
    Chongruk C
    J Dent Assoc Thai; 1987; 37(4-6):195-201. PubMed ID: 3483861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical study of the sensitivity and dynamic range of three digital systems, E-speed film and digitized film.
    Bóscolo FN; Oliveira AE; Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
    Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):191-5. PubMed ID: 11696917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.