These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20351450)
1. Psychometric aspects of item mapping for criterion-referenced interpretation and bookmark standard setting. Huynh H J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 20351450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bookmark locations and item response model selection in the presence of local item dependence. Skaggs G J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 17215566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard setting with dichotomous and constructed response items: some Rasch model approaches. MacCann RG J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):438-54. PubMed ID: 19934530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education. De Champlain AF Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations. Halkitis PN J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving measurement in health education and health behavior research using item response modeling: introducing item response modeling. Wilson M; Allen DD; Li JC Health Educ Res; 2006 Dec; 21 Suppl 1():i4-18. PubMed ID: 17018765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Item set discrimination and the unit in the Rasch model. Humphry S J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 22805360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Downing SM Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2005; 10(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16078098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review. Thomas ML Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):291-307. PubMed ID: 20644081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The 18 Household Food Security Survey items provide valid food security classifications for adults and children in the Caribbean. Gulliford MC; Nunes C; Rocke B BMC Public Health; 2006 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 16466571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigating latent constructs with item response models: a MATLAB IRTm toolbox. Braeken J; Tuerlinckx F Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1127-37. PubMed ID: 19897820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating. Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates. Smith RM; Suh KK J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Unique properties of Rasch model item information functions. Penfield RD J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(4):355-65. PubMed ID: 16192660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rasch analysis of distractors in multiple-choice items. Wang WC J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(1):43-65. PubMed ID: 9661731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items. He Q; Wheadon C J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests. Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rasch analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale in multiple sclerosis. Mills R; Young C; Nicholas R; Pallant J; Tennant A Mult Scler; 2009 Jan; 15(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 18755824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Item response theory in affective instrument development: an illustration. Beck CT; Gable RK J Nurs Meas; 2001; 9(1):5-22. PubMed ID: 11469142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]