These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20354094)

  • 1. Reasons for placement of restorations on previously unrestored tooth surfaces by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Nascimento MM; Gordan VV; Qvist V; Litaker MS; Rindal DB; Williams OD; Fellows JL; Ritchie LK; Mjör IA; McClelland J; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Apr; 141(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 20354094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Restoration of noncarious tooth defects by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Nascimento MM; Gordan VV; Qvist V; Bader JD; Rindal DB; Williams OD; Gewartowski D; Fellows JL; Litaker MS; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Dec; 142(12):1368-75. PubMed ID: 22130438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practitioner, patient and carious lesion characteristics associated with type of restorative material: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Makhija SK; Gordan VV; Gilbert GH; Litaker MS; Rindal DB; Pihlstrom DJ; Qvist V;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jun; 142(6):622-32. PubMed ID: 21628683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Geraldeli S; Rindal DB; Qvist V; Fellows JL; Kellum HP; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Jun; 143(6):593-601. PubMed ID: 22653939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
    Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    McCracken MS; Gordan VV; Litaker MS; Funkhouser E; Fellows JL; Shamp DG; Qvist V; Meral JS; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2013 Jun; 144(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 23729455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences between reported and actual restored caries lesion depths: results from The Dental PBRN.
    Rindal DB; Gordan VV; Fellows JL; Spurlock NL; Bauer MR; Litaker MS; Gilbert GH
    Tex Dent J; 2014 Jul; 131(7):520-8. PubMed ID: 25265686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restorative material and other tooth-specific variables associated with the decision to repair or replace defective restorations: findings from The Dental PBRN.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Worley DC; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2012 May; 40(5):397-405. PubMed ID: 22342563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK.
    Blum IR; Younis N; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():66-72. PubMed ID: 27988345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
    Soncini JA; Maserejian NN; Trachtenberg F; Tavares M; Hayes C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 17545265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences between reported and actual restored caries lesion depths: results from The Dental PBRN.
    Rindal DB; Gordan VV; Fellows JL; Spurlock NL; Bauer MR; Litaker MS; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):248-54. PubMed ID: 22245444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentist and practice characteristics associated with restorative treatment of enamel caries in permanent teeth: multiple-regression modeling of observational clinical data from the National Dental PBRN.
    Fellows JL; Gordan VV; Gilbert GH; Rindal DB; Qvist V; Litaker MS; Benjamin P; Flink H; Pihlstrom DJ; Johnson N;
    Am J Dent; 2014 Apr; 27(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 25000667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restorative treatment thresholds for occlusal primary caries among dentists in the dental practice-based research network.
    Gordan VV; Bader JD; Garvan CW; Richman JS; Qvist V; Fellows JL; Rindal DB; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Feb; 141(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 20123876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An audit on the placement and replacement of restorations in a general dental practice.
    Frost PM
    Prim Dent Care; 2002 Jan; 9(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 11901789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rubber dam use during routine operative dentistry procedures: findings from the Dental PBRN.
    Gilbert GH; Litaker MS; Pihlstrom DJ; Amundson CW; Gordan VV;
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):491-9. PubMed ID: 20945739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study.
    Borgia E; Baron R; Borgia JL
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e195-e203. PubMed ID: 28513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial.
    Bernardo M; Luis H; Martin MD; Leroux BG; Rue T; Leitão J; DeRouen TA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):775-83. PubMed ID: 17545266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
    Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.