These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20354094)

  • 21. The decision to repair or replace a defective restoration is affected by who placed the original restoration: findings from the National Dental PBRN.
    Gordan VV; Riley J; Geraldeli S; Williams OD; Spoto JC; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1528-34. PubMed ID: 25223822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
    Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.
    Rosenstiel SF; Land MF; Rashid RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 91(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 15116038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Direct placement restorative materials for use in posterior teeth: the current options.
    Lyons K;
    N Z Dent J; 2003 Mar; 99(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15330384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States Navy Dental Corps.
    York AK; Arthur JS
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 8152990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Frequency of restoration replacement in posterior teeth for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel.
    Laccabue M; Ahlf RL; Simecek JW
    Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23802636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Restorative outcomes for endodontically treated teeth in the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning network.
    Spielman H; Schaffer SB; Cohen MG; Wu H; Vena DA; Collie D; Curro FA; Thompson VP; Craig RG;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Jul; 143(7):746-55. PubMed ID: 22751976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings.
    Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth.
    Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harnekar SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 10(10):CD004483. PubMed ID: 27748505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Selection of restorative materials in permanent teeth in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE; Dahl JE
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1999 Oct; 57(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 10614902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.
    Yengopal V; Harneker SY; Patel N; Siegfried N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2009 Apr; (2):CD004483. PubMed ID: 19370602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland.
    Mjör IA; Shen C; Eliasson ST; Richter S
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 11931133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
    Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An analysis of the timing and materials associated with pulp disease following restorative dental treatment.
    Yong JB; Sivarajan S; Abbott PV
    Int Endod J; 2018 Dec; 51(12):1327-1335. PubMed ID: 29779218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice.
    Mjör IA; Moorhead JE; Dahl JE
    Int Dent J; 2000 Dec; 50(6):361-6. PubMed ID: 11197194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prevalence of cusp fractures in teeth restored with amalgam and with resin-based composite.
    Wahl MJ; Schmitt MM; Overton DA; Gordon MK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2004 Aug; 135(8):1127-32; quiz 1164-5. PubMed ID: 15387051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Association between caries location and restorative material treatment provided.
    Lubisich EB; Hilton TJ; Ferracane JL; Pashova HI; Burton B;
    J Dent; 2011 Apr; 39(4):302-8. PubMed ID: 21256915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.