These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20354097)

  • 1. Making Class II resin-based composite restorations predictable and profitable.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2010 Apr; 141(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 20354097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overcoming obstacles to placing posterior direct resin restorations.
    Bertolotti RL
    Dent Today; 2000 Jul; 19(7):66-71. PubMed ID: 12524821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Overcoming the challenges of Class II resin-based composites.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2006 Jul; 137(7):1021-3. PubMed ID: 16803830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treating patients with CARE (comfortable aesthetic restorations): reducing postoperative sensitivity in direct posterior composite restorations.
    Ward DH
    Dent Today; 2004 Aug; 23(8):60, 62, 64-5. PubMed ID: 15354708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictable restoration of Class 2 preparations with composite resin.
    Strassler HE; Trushkowsky RD
    Dent Today; 2004 Jan; 23(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 14969004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of sectional matrix systems in class II direct composite restorations.
    Lowe RA
    Dent Today; 2004 Oct; 23(10):108, 110-2. PubMed ID: 15559461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Update on dental composite restorations.
    Bayne SC; Heymann HO; Swift EJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1994 Jun; 125(6):687-701. PubMed ID: 8014334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in class I, II and V restorations.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Feb; 133(2):229-31. PubMed ID: 11868844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.
    van Dijken JW; Kieri C; Carlén M
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1319-25. PubMed ID: 10403459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative in vivo evaluation of four restorative concepts for mixed Class V restorations.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Loher CE
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jun; 22(6):455-65. PubMed ID: 1882038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations.
    Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 1299249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of Class II silver glass ionomer/composite restorations.
    Stratmann RG; Donly KJ
    Am J Dent; 1991 Apr; 4(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 1906718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glass ionomer-composite sandwich technique.
    Suzuki M; Jordan RE
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 Jan; 120(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 2404044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preventing sensitivity in Class II composite resin restorations.
    Christensen GJ
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Oct; 129(10):1469-70. PubMed ID: 9787546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence summary: which dental liners under amalgam restorations are more effective in reducing postoperative sensitivity?
    Nasser M
    Br Dent J; 2011 Jun; 210(11):533-7. PubMed ID: 21660022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.