These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20354227)

  • 1. Lehmann family of ROC curves.
    Gönen M; Heller G
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(4):509-17. PubMed ID: 20354227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
    Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The "proper" binormal model: parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation with degenerate data.
    Pan X; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 1997 May; 4(5):380-9. PubMed ID: 9156236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Equivalence of binormal likelihood-ratio and bi-chi-squared ROC curve models.
    Hillis SL
    Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2031-57. PubMed ID: 26608405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
    Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
    Hanley JA
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A bivariate contaminated binormal model for robust fitting of proper ROC curves to a pair of correlated, possibly degenerate, ROC datasets.
    Zhai X; Chakraborty DP
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2207-2222. PubMed ID: 28382718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mixtures of receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Gönen M
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Jul; 20(7):831-7. PubMed ID: 23643788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An analytic expression for the binormal partial area under the ROC curve.
    Hillis SL; Metz CE
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1491-8. PubMed ID: 23122568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the mean-to-sigma ratio as a measure of the improperness of binormal ROC curves.
    Hillis SL; Berbaum KS
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):143-54. PubMed ID: 21232682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimum-norm estimation for binormal receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
    Davidov O; Nov Y
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):1030-46. PubMed ID: 19894216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence bands for receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Ma G; Hall WJ
    Med Decis Making; 1993; 13(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 8412547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transformation-invariant and nonparametric monotone smooth estimation of ROC curves.
    Du P; Tang L
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 18985706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constructing "proper" ROCs from ordinal response data using weighted power functions.
    Mossman D; Peng H
    Med Decis Making; 2014 May; 34(4):523-35. PubMed ID: 24029820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies involving binormal ROC curve indices.
    Obuchowski NA; McClish DK
    Stat Med; 1997 Jul; 16(13):1529-42. PubMed ID: 9249923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy and ROC Curves with Covariate Adjusted Semiparametric Mixtures.
    Doebler P; Holling H
    Psychometrika; 2015 Dec; 80(4):1084-104. PubMed ID: 25361619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Goodness-of-fit issues in ROC curve estimation.
    Walsh SJ
    Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 10231082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using Dual Beta Distributions to Create "Proper" ROC Curves Based on Rating Category Data.
    Mossman D; Peng H
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Apr; 36(3):349-65. PubMed ID: 25911601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two correlated ROC curves at a given specificity or sensitivity level.
    Bantis LE; Feng Z
    Stat Med; 2016 Oct; 35(24):4352-4367. PubMed ID: 27324068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.