995 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20354472)
1. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
Sasso RC; Best NM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [LOCATION CHANGE OF ROTATION CENTER AFTER SINGLE SEGMENTAL CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT WITH ProDisc-C].
Lou J; Liu H; Rong X; Gong Q; Song Y; Li T
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Jan; 29(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 26455172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of two-level total disc replacement on cervical spine kinematics.
Phillips FM; Tzermiadianos MN; Voronov LI; Havey RM; Carandang G; Dooris A; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):E794-9. PubMed ID: 19829242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in cervical range of motion and sagittal alignment in early and late phases after total disc replacement: radiographic follow-up exceeding 2 years.
Ahn PG; Kim KN; Moon SW; Kim KS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Dec; 11(6):688-95. PubMed ID: 19951021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Correlation of radiostereometric measured cervical range of motion with clinical radiographic findings after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.
Park SA; Fayyazi AH; Ordway NR; Sun MH; Fredrickson BE; Yuan HA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):680-6. PubMed ID: 19333099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Cobb technique, quantitative motion analysis, and radiostereometric analysis in measurement of segmental range of motions after lumbar total disc arthroplasty.
Park SA; Ordway NR; Fayyazi AH; Fredrickson BE; Yuan HA
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):602-9. PubMed ID: 19956035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anterior transvertebral herniotomy for cervical disc herniation: a long-term follow-up study.
Sakai T; Katoh S; Sairyo K; Tamura T; Hirohashi N; Higashino K; Yasui N
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Aug; 22(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 19652566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy disc.
Lazaro BC; Yucesoy K; Yuksel KZ; Kowalczyk I; Rabin D; Fink M; Duggal N
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E6. PubMed ID: 20568921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantifying the effects of age, gender, degeneration, and adjacent level degeneration on cervical spine range of motion using multivariate analyses.
Simpson AK; Biswas D; Emerson JW; Lawrence BD; Grauer JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 18197104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical analysis of disc pressure and facet contact force after simulated two-level cervical surgeries (fusion and arthroplasty) and hybrid surgery.
Park J; Shin JJ; Lim J
World Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 82(6):1388-93. PubMed ID: 24937596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of load sharing on uncovertebral and facet joints at the C5-6 level with implantation of the Bryan, Prestige LP, or ProDisc-C cervical disc prosthesis: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Kang H; Park P; La Marca F; Hollister SJ; Lin CY
Neurosurg Focus; 2010 Jun; 28(6):E9. PubMed ID: 20568924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.
Kim SW; Paik SH; Castro PA; Baek SW; Shin DJ; Kwak YH; Ju YS
Spine J; 2010 Aug; 10(8):683-8. PubMed ID: 20537960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease.
Shin DA; Yi S; Yoon DH; Kim KN; Shin HC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(11):1153-9; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 19444062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of in vivo kinematics of 3 different cervical devices: Bryan disc, ProDisc-C, and Prestige LP disc.
Kowalczyk I; Lazaro BC; Fink M; Rabin D; Duggal N
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Dec; 15(6):630-5. PubMed ID: 21905776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Segmental contribution toward total cervical range of motion: a comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion.
Auerbach JD; Anakwenze OA; Milby AH; Lonner BS; Balderston RA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1593-9. PubMed ID: 21508886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
