BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20354837)

  • 1. Young patients' attitudes toward removable appliance wear times, wear-time instructions and electronic wear-time measurements--results of a questionnaire study.
    Schott TC; Göz G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2010 Mar; 71(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 20354837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison between indirect and objective wear-time assessment of removable orthodontic appliances.
    Schott TC; Meyer-Gutknecht H; Mayer N; Weber J; Weimer K
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Apr; 39(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 27030283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Questionnaire study of electronic wear-time tracking as experienced by patients and parents during treatment with removable orthodontic appliances.
    Schott TC; Schrey S; Walter J; Glasl BA; Ludwig B
    J Orofac Orthop; 2013 May; 74(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 23649280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How patient-selected colors for removable appliances are reflected in electronically tracked compliance (wear times and wear behavior).
    Schott TC; Menne D
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Jul; 88(4):458-464. PubMed ID: 29583018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased BMI in children-an indicator for less compliance during orthodontic treatment with removable appliances.
    von Bremen J; Lorenz N; Ludwig B; Ruf S
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul; 40(4):350-355. PubMed ID: 29471384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective assessment of patient compliance with removable orthodontic appliances: a cross-sectional cohort study.
    Tsomos G; Ludwig B; Grossen J; Pazera P; Gkantidis N
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 23834273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying patient adherence during active orthodontic treatment with removable appliances using microelectronic wear-time documentation.
    Schäfer K; Ludwig B; Meyer-Gutknecht H; Schott TC
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 24993614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Use of Microsensors to Assess the Daily Wear Time of Removable Orthodontic Appliances: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Nahajowski M; Lis J; Sarul M
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Mar; 22(7):. PubMed ID: 35408050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objective assessment of compliance with intra- and extraoral removable appliances.
    Arreghini A; Trigila S; Lombardo L; Siciliani G
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Jan; 87(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 27508935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objectively measured patient cooperation during early orthodontic treatment: Does psychology have an impact?
    Sarul M; Lewandowska B; Kawala B; Kozanecka A; Antoszewska-Smith J
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2017 Nov; 26(8):1245-1251. PubMed ID: 29264882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Methods to evaluate compliance of patients with removable appliances-survey results.
    Meyer-Gutknecht H; Fritz U; Schott TC
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Mar; 75(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 24595899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. FIXED OR REMOVABLE APPLIANCE FOR EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL ANTERIOR CROSSBITE.
    Wiedel AP
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2015; (238):10-72. PubMed ID: 26939312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of patient compliance with Hawley retainers and removable functional appliances during the retention phase.
    Schott TC; Schlipf C; Glasl B; Schwarzer CL; Weber J; Ludwig B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Oct; 144(4):533-40. PubMed ID: 24075661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Recommended times for wearing removable appliances--the results of a survey].
    Witt E; Bartsch A; Sahm G
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1992 Apr; 53(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 1577346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of wear time recording on the patient's compliance.
    Pauls A; Nienkemper M; Panayotidis A; Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Nov; 83(6):1002-8. PubMed ID: 23611166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objectively measured compliance during early orthodontic treatment: Do treatment needs have an impact?
    Sarul M; Kawala B; Kozanecka A; Łyczek J; Antoszewska-Smith J
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2017; 26(1):83-87. PubMed ID: 28397437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional and social discomfort during orthodontic treatment--effects on compliance and prediction of patients' adaptation by personality variables.
    Sergl HG; Klages U; Zentner A
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 22(3):307-15. PubMed ID: 10920563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of objective wear time between monoblock and twin-block appliances measured by microsensor.
    Kutay C; Kılıçoğlu H; Sayar G
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Nov; 91(6):749-755. PubMed ID: 34319376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patients' attitudes towards compliance with retainer wear.
    Wong P; Freer TJ
    Aust Orthod J; 2005 May; 21(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 16433081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The determinants of wear behavior in treatment with removable orthodontic appliances].
    Witt E; Bartsch A; Sahm G; Schneider S
    Fortschr Kieferorthop; 1992 Dec; 53(6):322-9. PubMed ID: 1487216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.