156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20356347)
1. Underground friends or enemies: model plants help to unravel direct and indirect effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant competition.
Facelli E; Smith SE; Facelli JM; Christophersen HM; Andrew Smith F
New Phytol; 2010 Mar; 185(4):1050-61. PubMed ID: 20356347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduced mycorrhizal colonization (rmc) tomato mutant lacks expression of SymRK signaling pathway genes.
Nair A; Bhargava S
Plant Signal Behav; 2012 Dec; 7(12):1578-83. PubMed ID: 23221680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does the presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence growth and nutrient uptake of a wild-type tomato cultivar and a mycorrhiza-defective mutant, cultivated with roots sharing the same soil volume?
Neumann E; George E
New Phytol; 2005 May; 166(2):601-9. PubMed ID: 15819922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct and indirect influences of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on phosphorus uptake by two root hemiparasitic Pedicularis species: do the fungal partners matter at low colonization levels?
Li AR; Guan KY; Stonor R; Smith SE; Smith FA
Ann Bot; 2013 Oct; 112(6):1089-98. PubMed ID: 23946322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethylene-dependent/ethylene-independent ABA regulation of tomato plants colonized by arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi.
Martín-Rodríguez JÁ; León-Morcillo R; Vierheilig H; Ocampo JA; Ludwig-Müller J; García-Garrido JM
New Phytol; 2011 Apr; 190(1):193-205. PubMed ID: 21232061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the allergenic potential of tomato.
Schwarz D; Welter S; George E; Franken P; Lehmann K; Weckwerth W; Dölle S; Worm M
Mycorrhiza; 2011 Jul; 21(5):341-349. PubMed ID: 21063890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Local and distal effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization on direct pathway Pi uptake and root growth in Medicago truncatula.
Watts-Williams SJ; Jakobsen I; Cavagnaro TR; Grønlund M
J Exp Bot; 2015 Jul; 66(13):4061-73. PubMed ID: 25944927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Plant growth depressions in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses: not just caused by carbon drain?
Li H; Smith FA; Dickson S; Holloway RE; Smith SE
New Phytol; 2008; 178(4):852-862. PubMed ID: 18346106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Arbuscular mycorrhizal inhibition of growth in barley cannot be attributed to extent of colonization, fungal phosphorus uptake or effects on expression of plant phosphate transporter genes.
Grace EJ; Cotsaftis O; Tester M; Smith FA; Smith SE
New Phytol; 2009 Mar; 181(4):938-949. PubMed ID: 19140934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Potassium Transporter SlHAK10 Is Involved in Mycorrhizal Potassium Uptake.
Liu J; Liu J; Liu J; Cui M; Huang Y; Tian Y; Chen A; Xu G
Plant Physiol; 2019 May; 180(1):465-479. PubMed ID: 30760639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The symbiosis with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis drives root water transport in flooded tomato plants.
Calvo-Polanco M; Molina S; Zamarreño AM; García-Mina JM; Aroca R
Plant Cell Physiol; 2014 May; 55(5):1017-29. PubMed ID: 24553847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Activation of basal defense mechanisms of rice plants by Glomus intraradices does not affect the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.
Campos-Soriano L; García-Garrido JM; San Segundo B
New Phytol; 2010 Oct; 188(2):597-614. PubMed ID: 20659300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The LysM receptor-like kinase SlLYK10 regulates the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in tomato.
Buendia L; Wang T; Girardin A; Lefebvre B
New Phytol; 2016 Apr; 210(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 26612325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis limits foliar transcriptional responses to viral infection and favors long-term virus accumulation.
Miozzi L; Catoni M; Fiorilli V; Mullineaux PM; Accotto GP; Lanfranco L
Mol Plant Microbe Interact; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1562-72. PubMed ID: 21899386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Arbuscular mycorrhizal growth responses are fungal specific but do not differ between soybean genotypes with different phosphate efficiency.
Wang X; Zhao S; Bücking H
Ann Bot; 2016 Jul; 118(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 27208734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interactions between the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus Glomus intraradices and nontransformed tomato roots of either wild-type or AM-defective phenotypes in monoxenic cultures.
Bago A; Cano C; Toussaint JP; Smith S; Dickson S
Mycorrhiza; 2006 Sep; 16(6):429-436. PubMed ID: 16649032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inoculum type does not affect overall resistance of an arbuscular mycorrhiza-defective tomato mutant to colonisation but inoculation does change competitive interactions with wild-type tomato.
Cavagnaro TR; Smith FA; Hay G; Carne-Cavagnaro VL; Smith SE
New Phytol; 2004 Feb; 161(2):485-494. PubMed ID: 33873510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizae on tomato yield, nutrient uptake, water relations, and soil carbon dynamics under deficit irrigation in field conditions.
Bowles TM; Barrios-Masias FH; Carlisle EA; Cavagnaro TR; Jackson LE
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Oct; 566-567():1223-1234. PubMed ID: 27266519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Opening the black box: outcomes of interactions between arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and non-host genotypes of Medicago depend on fungal identity, interplay between P uptake pathways and external P supply.
Facelli E; Duan T; Smith SE; Christophersen HM; Facelli JM; Smith FA
Plant Cell Environ; 2014 Jun; 37(6):1382-92. PubMed ID: 24236504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physiological and molecular evidence for Pi uptake via the symbiotic pathway in a reduced mycorrhizal colonization mutant in tomato associated with a compatible fungus.
Poulsen KH; Nagy R; Gao LL; Smith SE; Bucher M; Smith FA; Jakobsen I
New Phytol; 2005 Nov; 168(2):445-54. PubMed ID: 16219083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
