BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20356786)

  • 1. Cardiac MRI is superior to gated blood pool imaging in the assessment of left ventricular function in patients post-cardiac transplantation.
    Strugnell WE; Hamilton-Craig CR; Parry TA; Bartlett HJ; Slaughter RE
    Heart Lung Circ; 2010 Jul; 19(7):400-5. PubMed ID: 20356786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New generation 3-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular volumetric and functional measurements: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Nikitin NP; Constantin C; Loh PH; Ghosh J; Lukaschuk EI; Bennett A; Hurren S; Alamgir F; Clark AL; Cleland JG
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2006 Oct; 7(5):365-72. PubMed ID: 16916621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function using 64-slice multislice computed tomography and 2D echocardiography: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Annuar BR; Liew CK; Chin SP; Ong TK; Seyfarth MT; Chan WL; Fong YY; Ang CK; Lin N; Liew HB; Sim KH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 17466480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cardiac MRI: accuracy of simultaneous measurement of left and right ventricular parameters using three different sequences.
    Koskenvuo JW; Karra H; Lehtinen J; Niemi P; Pärkkä J; Knuuti J; Hartiala JJ
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2007 Nov; 27(6):385-93. PubMed ID: 17944662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrocardiographically gated blood-pool SPECT and left ventricular function: comparative value of 3 methods for ejection fraction and volume estimation.
    Daou D; Harel F; Helal BO; Fourme T; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Mariano-Goulart D; Faraggi M; Slama M; Le Guludec D
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 42(7):1043-9. PubMed ID: 11438625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging].
    Koch K; Oellig F; Kunz P; Bender P; Oberholzer K; Mildenberger P; Hake U; Kreitner KF; Thelen M
    Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1786-93. PubMed ID: 15573290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of left ventricular parameters obtained by automated software for 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Akram K; Anderson HD; Voros S
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2009 Nov; 32(6):1154-60. PubMed ID: 19771473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Left ventricular papillary muscles and trabeculae are significant determinants of cardiac MRI volumetric measurements: effects on clinical standards in patients with advanced systolic dysfunction.
    Weinsaft JW; Cham MD; Janik M; Min JK; Henschke CI; Yankelevitz DF; Devereux RB
    Int J Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 126(3):359-65. PubMed ID: 17698216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Assessment of ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in comparison with 99mTc gated SPECT].
    Pasowicz M; Klimeczek P; Wicher-Muniak E; Kolasa-Trela R; Kostkiewicz M; Szot W; Podolec P; Banyś R; Tracz W
    Przegl Lek; 2004; 61(6):674-7. PubMed ID: 15724663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gated 99mTc-MIBI single-photon emission computed tomography for the evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction: comparison with three-dimensional echocardiography.
    Lipiec P; Wejner-Mik P; Krzemińska-Pakuła M; Kuśmierek J; Płachcińska A; Szumiński R; Kapusta A; Kasprzak JD
    Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Oct; 22(8):723-6. PubMed ID: 18982477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Investigation of normal ranges for left ventricular ejection fraction in cardiac gated blood pool imaging studies using different processing workstations.
    Hiscock SC; Evans MJ; Morton RJ; Hall DO
    Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Feb; 29(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 18094631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of global and regional left ventricular function assessed by gated-SPECT and 2-D echocardiography.
    Cwajg E; Cwajg J; Keng F; He ZX; Nagueh S; Verani MS
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2000 Feb; 19 Suppl 1():I39-46. PubMed ID: 10750438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operator induced variability in left ventricular measurements with cardiovascular magnetic resonance is improved after training.
    Karamitsos TD; Hudsmith LE; Selvanayagam JB; Neubauer S; Francis JM
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):777-83. PubMed ID: 17891615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is the optimal clinical technique for measurement of left ventricular volume after myocardial infarction? A comparative study of 3-dimensional echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chan J; Jenkins C; Khafagi F; Du L; Marwick TH
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Feb; 19(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 16455424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of accordance of magnetic resonance volumetric and flow measurements in determining ventricular stroke volume in cardiac patients.
    Jeltsch M; Ranft S; Klass O; Aschoff AJ; Hoffmann MH
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):530-9. PubMed ID: 18568540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated frame-by-frame endocardial border detection from cardiac magnetic resonance images for quantitative assessment of left ventricular function: validation and clinical feasibility.
    Corsi C; Veronesi F; Lamberti C; Bardo DM; Jamison EB; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Mar; 29(3):560-8. PubMed ID: 19243037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gated blood-pool SPECT automated versus manual left ventricular function calculations.
    Slart RH; Poot L; Piers DA; van Veldhuisen DJ; Nichols K; Jager PL
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Jan; 25(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 15061268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved interobserver variability and accuracy of echocardiographic visual left ventricular ejection fraction assessment through a self-directed learning program using cardiac magnetic resonance images.
    Thavendiranathan P; Popović ZB; Flamm SD; Dahiya A; Grimm RA; Marwick TH
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2013 Nov; 26(11):1267-73. PubMed ID: 23993695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of left ventricular parameters in orthotopic heart transplant recipients using dual-source CT and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: comparison with MRI.
    Arraiza M; Azcárate PM; De Cecco CN; Viteri G; Simón-Yarza I; Hernández-Estefanía R; Rábago G; Bastarrika G
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3282-8. PubMed ID: 22561021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cardiac magnetic resonance in transfusion dependent thalassaemia: assessment of iron load and relationship to left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Chouliaras GL; Kattamis A; Berdoukas V; Gotsis ED; Mavrogeni S; Ladis V
    Br J Haematol; 2010 Nov; 151(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 20813008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.