These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20357683)

  • 1. Epidemiology in the courtroom: an evidence-based paradigm for the determination of causation in compensation environments.
    Sinclair DC
    J Occup Environ Med; 2010 Apr; 52(4):456-61. PubMed ID: 20357683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ["An Italian Court recognizes the occupational origin of a trigeminal neuroma in a mobile telephone user: a case-study of the complex relationships between science and laws"].
    Lagorio S; Vecchia P
    Med Lav; 2011; 102(2):144-62. PubMed ID: 21485052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The case against differential diagnosis: Daubert, medical causation testimony, and the scientific method.
    Hollingsworth JG; Lasker EG
    J Health Law; 2004; 37(1):85-111. PubMed ID: 15191237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guidelines for determining probability of causation under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000; revision of guidelines on non-radiogenic cancers. Final rule.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2012 Feb; 77(24):5711-4. PubMed ID: 22359805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of scientific evidence in law, adjudication and policy: when occupational health takes the witness chair.
    Guidotti TL
    Med Lav; 2006; 97(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 17017343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony.
    Merlino ML; Murray CI; Richardson JT
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18344168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Admissibility of scientific evidence post-Daubert.
    Masten J; Strzelczyk JJ
    Health Phys; 2001 Dec; 81(6):678-82. PubMed ID: 11725886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flickering admissibility: neuroimaging evidence in the U.S. courts.
    Moriarty JC
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 18327830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. National vaccine injury compensation program: the potential impact of Cedillo for vaccine-related autism cases.
    Moreland R
    J Leg Med; 2008; 29(3):363-80. PubMed ID: 18726760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethical Challenges for the Medical Expert Witness.
    Kass JS; Rose RV
    AMA J Ethics; 2016 Mar; 18(3):201-8. PubMed ID: 27002990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causation and disease: biomedical science in toxic tort litigation.
    Muscat JE; Huncharek MS
    J Occup Med; 1989 Dec; 31(12):997-1002. PubMed ID: 2614542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The physician expert witness and the U.S. Supreme court--an epidemiologic approach.
    Norton ML
    Med Law; 2002; 21(3):435-49. PubMed ID: 12437195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The admissibility of offender profiling in courtroom: a review of legal issues and court opinions.
    Bosco D; ZappalĂ  A; Santtila P
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 20416950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. US Supreme Court decisions, expert testimony, and implant dentistry.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 12498453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Expert witness testimony: the ethics of being a medical expert witness.
    Andrew LB
    Emerg Med Clin North Am; 2006 Aug; 24(3):715-31. PubMed ID: 16877139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. U.S. Industries v. Director: "claim" versus "condition" in the analysis of workers' compensation cases.
    Yospe J
    Am J Law Med; 1986; 12(2):273-303. PubMed ID: 2964779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.